1996
DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10221-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the nonlinear fracture behaviour of ordinary ceramic refractory materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
18

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
45
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial slope k init corresponds to the stiffness of a material and is proportional to an effective modulus of elasticity (Harmuth et al 1996). No significant differences were found between the RT and TR orientations for both species; k init was only slightly higher for yew RT than for yew TR, whereas it was distinctly higher for spruce TR than for spruce RT (Table 1).…”
Section: Characteristic Behaviour Prior To the Load Peakmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The initial slope k init corresponds to the stiffness of a material and is proportional to an effective modulus of elasticity (Harmuth et al 1996). No significant differences were found between the RT and TR orientations for both species; k init was only slightly higher for yew RT than for yew TR, whereas it was distinctly higher for spruce TR than for spruce RT (Table 1).…”
Section: Characteristic Behaviour Prior To the Load Peakmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The opposite may also occur, since the aggregates may be strongly bonded to the mortar, becoming fractured during the crack opening process 1,2,12 . To study the fracture behavior of the mortar and concretes, the wedge splitting method was used to produce stable crack propagation in the sample, which is a necessary situation for calculating fracture energy [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . The wedge splitting method was patented in 1986 by Tschegg 26 and since then numerous studies have focused on improving this test, which is currently performed with well designed and accurate devices, as well as highly accurate testing machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…em que d(U M +U S )/dc é a variação das energias elásticas armazenadas na máquina (U M ) e na amostra (U S ) por unidade de propagação de trinca (dc), sendo essa, portanto, a variação da energia potencial, e dW fs /dc é a variação da energia de superfície (dW fs ) por unidade de propagação de trinca [11,16,18], representando a variação da energia consumida durante o processo de propagação. Até pouco tempo atrás a energia de fratura de refratários era predominantemente determinada pelo método da barra prismática entalhada e flexionada em três pontos, conforme esquematizado na Fig.…”
Section: This Paper Discusses the Design And Installation Of Devices unclassified
“…F H e β são, respectivamente: força horizontal para a abertura da trinca e ângulo da cunha [10], (b) geometria da amostra, dimensões e secção transversal mostrando a região por onde a trinca propaga (medidas em mm) [11], (c) detalhes do entalhe, das ranhuras laterais e da secção de fratura após teste. 0,4 da altura, restando assim pequena área de fratura.…”
Section: And (B) Cross Section Showing the Region Where The Crack Prunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation