We analyse inhibition of emission in a 2.5D photonic structures made up a photonic crystal (PhC) and Bragg mirrors using FDTD simulations. A comparison is made between an isolated PhC membrane and the same PhC suspended onto a Bragg mirror or sandwiched between 2 Bragg mirrors. Strong inhibition of the Purcell factor is observed in a broad spectral range, whatever the in-plane orientation and location of the emitting dipole. We analysed these results numerically and theoretically by simulating the experimentally observed lifetime of a collection of randomly distributed emitters, showing that their average emission rate is decreased by more than one decade, both for coupled or isolated emitters.
INTRODUCTIONSince the late 80's, Photonic Crystal (PhC) were used to optimise interactions between light and matter. In most of cases, using the Bloch modes supported by the PhC, the main goal was to control the absorption [1,2,3], or the emission [4,5,6] of devices such as photodetectors, solar cells, microlasers or single photon sources. For the latter, the goal is not only to increase the emission rate in one single mode using Purcell effect, but also to avoid all parasitic emissions in order to funnel spontaneous emission (SE) in a single mode of interest [7]. In other words, the goal is to inhibit SE in all modes except one. Inhibiting SE in PhC have been studied since the seminal work of E. Yablonovitch [8], where a 3D photonic band-gap structure is used to stifle the SE rate in semiconductors. This method allows for controlling the local density of optical modes (LDOS) at the position of the emitters and on a large spectral range. Inhibition on such sample was experimentally demonstrated [9], but, due to difficulty in elaboration of 3D structures, the measured inhibition factors, which is defined as the ratio of the SE rate in bulk material over the SE rate in the PhC structure, remained relatively low (<10). However the control of the SE rate could be reached whatever the location and the polarization of the emitter. Other approaches were also studied, where inhibition is stronger but with constraints on the emitter position or orientation. For example, using micro pillars grown on a mirror leads to an