1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(95)08525-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the stresses and stress intensity factors responsible for fracture of thin protective films during ultra-micro indentation tests with spherical indenters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thin films (Fig. 2c): Cracking becomes suppressed within the compression zone beneath the Hertzian contact, and the maximum tensile stresses shift back to the top surface close to the contact circle [39][40][41]. Membrane stresses come increasingly into play.…”
Section: Theoretical Aspects In Single Vs Multilayer Deformation -Fementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thin films (Fig. 2c): Cracking becomes suppressed within the compression zone beneath the Hertzian contact, and the maximum tensile stresses shift back to the top surface close to the contact circle [39][40][41]. Membrane stresses come increasingly into play.…”
Section: Theoretical Aspects In Single Vs Multilayer Deformation -Fementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations were thus related to dislocation motion in general, and in particular to dislocation nucleation [3][4][5][6][7] or to dislocation source activation. [8,9] One of the major challenges in assessing the behavior of the elastic-plastic transition during nanoindentation is the difficulty in ascribing the behavior to homogeneous dislocation nucleation, [10] the activation of well-spaced dislocation sources, the activation of a point defect source (i.e., a vacancy), [9] and the tensile fracture of a surface film, [11][12][13][14] or some other surface film relationship with the underlying dislocation structure. [15] For instance, in a well-annealed metallic single crystal, it is not unreasonable to assume a dislocation density on the order of 10 11 m -2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that film failure was caused by large tensile stresses in the surface region outside the contact radius . [12] The large tensile stress at the surface for thin films was proven by Chai and Lawn using finite element analysis . [13] The representative curves for mode I stress intensity factor against a/hf showed the same trends as the current study .…”
Section: Mtot = Mb -Msubmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The radial stress has been demonstrated to cause the through thickness cracking of a hard film on soft substrate . [12] The radial stress prior to fracture can be estimated from a superposition of the bending stress and stretching stress created from the contact load [48] …”
Section: -40 50mentioning
confidence: 99%