2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the structure and properties of PVD coatings and ALD + PVD hybrid coatings deposited on sialon tool ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For all three materials with hybrid coatings, the stability of the potential values in the tested environment was found, the value of which increased with increasing PVD coating deposition time from about −150 mV for the material with the coating obtained after 30 min to about −50 mV after 120 min of deposition. The analysis of the results obtained from the Tafel calculations (Table 9) allows us to conclude that the application of hybrid coatings on the steel substrate caused a favorable change in the corrosion resistance of the tested materials, which is evidenced by an increase in the polarization resistance from 0.5 MΩ•cm 2 for the substrate material to 1.2 MΩ•cm 2 for Hybrid 1 sample, 3.9 MΩ•cm 2 for Hybrid 2 sample and 10 times for Hybrid 3 sample. A similar relationship was noted by comparing the corrosion current density results, the lowest value of which was 1.2 nA/cm 2 for the Hybrid 3 sample, decreased when shortening the PVD coating application time to 2.2 nA/cm 2 for the Hybrid 1 sample but was still more than 4× higher than for the 316L steel substrate material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For all three materials with hybrid coatings, the stability of the potential values in the tested environment was found, the value of which increased with increasing PVD coating deposition time from about −150 mV for the material with the coating obtained after 30 min to about −50 mV after 120 min of deposition. The analysis of the results obtained from the Tafel calculations (Table 9) allows us to conclude that the application of hybrid coatings on the steel substrate caused a favorable change in the corrosion resistance of the tested materials, which is evidenced by an increase in the polarization resistance from 0.5 MΩ•cm 2 for the substrate material to 1.2 MΩ•cm 2 for Hybrid 1 sample, 3.9 MΩ•cm 2 for Hybrid 2 sample and 10 times for Hybrid 3 sample. A similar relationship was noted by comparing the corrosion current density results, the lowest value of which was 1.2 nA/cm 2 for the Hybrid 3 sample, decreased when shortening the PVD coating application time to 2.2 nA/cm 2 for the Hybrid 1 sample but was still more than 4× higher than for the 316L steel substrate material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From Coatings 2021, 11, 963 7 of 16 these images, the surface roughness (RMS) for each coating was obtained, and the values were 11.96, 10.41, 5.593, and 5.591 nm at a bias voltage of 0, −100, −150, and −200 V, respectively. Obviously, the bias voltage had a huge impact on the coatings' RMS; there was no obvious change as the bias voltage increased from 0 to −100 V, while a great decrease in roughness occurred with the bias voltage increasing to −150 V, which was due to the bombardment of high-energy ion strengthening the adatoms' mobility, and they moved or diffused into the grain voids, generating smoother and denser coatings [35]. The surface morphologies of the HfC coatings are presented in Figure 6.…”
Section: Xrd Xps Tem and Afm Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in order to further improve the wear and corrosion resistance of titanium alloys, the surface of titanium alloys has been strengthened. The surface treatment methods used generally include plasma spray, physical vapor deposition (PVD), and electroplating [6][7][8]. However, these methods have a complex process, high cost, and low coating bonding strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%