2021
DOI: 10.3103/s1060992x21040093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Use of Neuron-Like Procedures for Processing Coherent Location Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [18], structural schemes for calculating a neuron-like CF are presented, the use of the Neumann-Pearson criterion is explained and the modeling process is described in detail. It is also explained what False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rate (FRR) errors are, and how the effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated on their basis (how performance characteristics are constructed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [18], structural schemes for calculating a neuron-like CF are presented, the use of the Neumann-Pearson criterion is explained and the modeling process is described in detail. It is also explained what False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rate (FRR) errors are, and how the effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated on their basis (how performance characteristics are constructed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also explained what False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rate (FRR) errors are, and how the effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated on their basis (how performance characteristics are constructed). In addition, the paper [18] studied the evaluation of the effect of the coherence value at the given threshold values of the FAR and FRR on the signal extraction procedure with Gaussian noise, when the location of underwater objects is determined using a sequence of coherent complex signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation