2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b04399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Water Adsorption Properties and Structural Stability of MIL-100(Fe) with Different Anions

Abstract: Investigating metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as water adsorbents has drawn increasing attention for their potential in energy-related applications such as water production and heat transformation. A specific MOF, MIL-100(Fe), is of particular interest for its large adsorption capacity with the occurrence of water condensation at a relatively low partial pressure. In the synthesis of MIL-100(Fe), depending on the reactants, structures with varying anion terminals (e.g., F, Cl, or OH) on the metal trimer have b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorption and desorption branches are shown with filled and empty circles, respectively, while the NVT + W results are shown with solid lines has been a considerable discrepancy in the saturation pressure various researchers have used. Some authors have used the experimental saturation pressure, 32,33 some have used the so-called "corrected" saturation pressure [34][35][36]38 while others have used the "uncorrected" saturation pressure. [39][40][41] Some conclusions are not affected by this choice, for example, if the same water model were used in different simulations with the objective of finding the relative hydrophilicity/ hydrophobicity of materials.…”
Section: Choice Of the Reference Saturation Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adsorption and desorption branches are shown with filled and empty circles, respectively, while the NVT + W results are shown with solid lines has been a considerable discrepancy in the saturation pressure various researchers have used. Some authors have used the experimental saturation pressure, 32,33 some have used the so-called "corrected" saturation pressure [34][35][36]38 while others have used the "uncorrected" saturation pressure. [39][40][41] Some conclusions are not affected by this choice, for example, if the same water model were used in different simulations with the objective of finding the relative hydrophilicity/ hydrophobicity of materials.…”
Section: Choice Of the Reference Saturation Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it can significantly affect the predicted deliverable capacity and the resulting choice of adsorbents for a particular application. To date, some studies have used experimental saturation pressures, 32,33 while others have used the socalled "corrected" saturation pressures as proposed by Horn et al [34][35][36][37][38] The rationale behind the corrected saturation pressures is that the free energy for the simulated system requires certain analytical corrections to match the experimental free energies. Yet, others have used saturation pressures corresponding to the simulated vapor-liquid equilibrium for the particular water model used without applying the analytical corrections to match experimental data as mentioned above (referred to as "uncorrected pressures" in this work).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the adsorption for MIL-100-SO 4 begins at a lower pressure than for MIL-100-Cl. Monte Carlo simulations in a grand canonical ensemble (GCMC) were carried out to confirm the influence of the three anions in the MIL-100(Fe) structures (e.g., F−, Cl−, or OH−) for water adsorption isotherms [ 83 ]. In the simulations, the water adsorption behavior and the relative structural stability of MIL-100(Fe) were investigated.…”
Section: Modification/functionalization Of Mofs Based On Water Adsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo simulations in a grand canonical ensemble (GCMC) were carried out to confirm the influence of the three anions in the MIL-100(Fe) structures (e.g., F−, Cl−, or OH−) for water adsorption isotherms. [73] In the simulations, the water adsorption behavior and the relative structural stability of MIL-100(Fe) were investigated. The small cages, which provide a stronger interaction with water molecules compared to the large cages, were completely filled with water at a notably lower pressure.…”
Section: Functionalized Mofs Bearing Ligand Functional Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%