2005
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-37-5-361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of three strategies for an international genetic evaluation of beef cattle weaning weight

Abstract:

Abstract

Weaning weights from 83 389 Limousin calves born between 1993 and 2002 in France and the Trans-Tasman block (Australia/New Zealand) were analysed to compare different strategies for running an international genetic evaluation for the breed. These records were a subset of the complete data for both countries and comprised a sample of herds that had recorded progeny of sires used across both countries. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for weaning weight were estimated within the countries. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In beef cattle, Phocas et al (2005) estimated genetic parameters and compared different strategies for an international genetic evaluation on Limousin breed. Venot et al (2007) implemented a genetic evaluation for weaning weight on the same breed among France, Ireland and United Kingdom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In beef cattle, Phocas et al (2005) estimated genetic parameters and compared different strategies for an international genetic evaluation on Limousin breed. Venot et al (2007) implemented a genetic evaluation for weaning weight on the same breed among France, Ireland and United Kingdom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 did not allow the deregression of two genetic effects simultaneously, which would, however, be appropriate using models that consider imprinting by including two genetic effects. In an article on the international genetic evaluation of beef cattle weaning weight 63 , the separate deregression of direct genetic effects and maternal genetic effects was described. A correction was presented, in which the contributions of the second correlated effect to the variance of the first are eliminated, when the first genetic effect is deregressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A correction was presented, in which the contributions of the second correlated effect to the variance of the first are eliminated, when the first genetic effect is deregressed. With the help of a λ-value, corrected heritability was computed both for the direct and maternal effect, which can be interpreted as equivalent heritability under a single trait model 63 . The same principle could be applied to the reduced imprinting model (for details see the Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of international evaluations, international EBVs (IEBVs) are computed across different environments (i.e., countries) for a series of traits ( Durr and Philipsson, 2012 ; Crook et al, 2019 ). Some of the traits evaluated in beef international evaluations are influenced by maternal effects, e.g., birth weight, weaning weight, and calving ease ( Phocas et al, 2005 ; Venot et al, 2006 ; Venot et al, 2007 ; Venot et al, 2008 ; Pabiou et al, 2014 ; Crook et al, 2019 ; Vesela et al, 2019 ). Due to the presence of genotype by environment interaction (i.e., genotype by country interaction), and differences in trait and model definition, genetic correlations ( r g ) for direct genetic effects, maternal genetic effects, and r dm can differ between countries ( De Mattos et al, 2000 ; Mark et al, 2005 ; Pabiou et al, 2014 ; Bonifazi et al, 2020b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International genetic evaluations require estimates of across-country r g ( Phocas et al, 2005 ). However, the estimation process can be challenging ( Mark et al, 2005 ; Venot et al, 2007 ), especially in beef cattle due to the low number of existing genetic connections between countries ( Berry et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%