Designing and Building With UHPFRC 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781118557839.ch24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of UHPFRC Slabs Under Blast Loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-energy absorption capacity of UHP-FRC, combined with its high resistance to scabbing, spalling, and fragmentation [7][8][9][10][11], makes it ideal for protective shields. The construction of shield plates plays an essential part in protecting existing strategic buildings against extreme loading conditions caused by blast, shock or impact loads [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: One Of the Potential Applications Of Uhp-frc Is In Protectiv...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high-energy absorption capacity of UHP-FRC, combined with its high resistance to scabbing, spalling, and fragmentation [7][8][9][10][11], makes it ideal for protective shields. The construction of shield plates plays an essential part in protecting existing strategic buildings against extreme loading conditions caused by blast, shock or impact loads [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: One Of the Potential Applications Of Uhp-frc Is In Protectiv...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the use of UHP-FRC produced a more ductile failure mode and no fragmentations when compared to conventional concrete (NSC and HSC) panels of the same size and geometry. Experimental research conducted over the past decade [14,[16][17][18][19][20][21] also demonstrates the outstanding performance of UHP-FRC structures and protective shields under blast loads. This research study aims to develop a high-performance protection system for new or existing structures against blast loading hazards by implementing accelerated construction technology with high-performance materials in the form of precast UHP-FRC shields.…”
Section: One Of the Potential Applications Of Uhp-frc Is In Protectiv...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found out experimentally at Ryerson University that the fracture energy of UHP-FRC is about 100 times that of ordinary concrete . The high-energy absorption capacity of UHP-FRC, as well as its resistance to scabbing, spalling and fragmentation (Li et al, 2015b;Millard et al, 2010;Riisgaard et al, 2006;Yi et al, 2012;Yu, 2015), enables the construction of shield plates that play an essential part in protecting existing strategic buildings against extreme loading conditions caused by blast, shock or impact loads (Cavill et al, 2006;Ellis et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2016;Li et al, 2015a;Othman, 2016;Othman and Marzouk, 2016;Rebentrost and White, 2011;Schleyer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strong engineering evidence on low-speed impact tests done by Othman and Marzouk (2016) on UHP-FRC slabs showed that UHP-FRC has more ductility and energy absorption due to the presence of fibres that bridge the cracks and thus also produces a more ductile failure mode and no fragmentations than the panels of the same size and geometry made from high-strength concrete (HSC) and normal-strength concrete (NSC). Moreover, the experimental research conducted over the past decade (Cavill et al, 2006;Mao et al, 2015;Ngo et al, 2013;Rebentrost, 2009;Slotz et al, 2014;Yi et al, 2012;Yu, 2015) showed that UHP-FRC has an outstanding performance in the field of defensive structures and protective shields, specifically against blast loads compared to HSC and NSC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In USA, three UHPdC prestressed concrete girder simple-span bridges have been constructed. In addition, UHPdC is also being considered to be used in a range of other applications such as precast concrete piles (Vande Voort et al, 2008), seismic retrofit of substandard bridge substructures (Massicotte and Boucher-Proulx, 2010;Brühwiler and Denarié, 2008), thin-bonded overlays on deteriorated bridge decks , and security and blast mitigation applications (Green, 2010;Rebentrost and Wight, 2009). According to Cavill and Chirgwin (2003), UHPdC is the best choice to be used in bridge constructions specifically when the bridge is located in an aggressive environment, when the weight is an important issue during construction as well as in the final structure, when fatigue or impact loads are serious issues, and when there are some priorities for architectural concerns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%