81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019 2019
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201901303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Water Coning Phenomena in a Fractured Reservoir Using the Embedded Discrete Fracture Model (EDFM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we use a twofold approximation for T −1 , i.e., exact in L 1 , U 1 and inexact in S , M −1 1 can be regarded as a member of the mixed constraint preconditioner class [96][97][98]. Similarly, the upper and lower block triangular factors in (22) play the role of decoupling operators for the original multi-physics problem and are the outcome of the general-purpose algebraic procedure defined in [99]. Finally, M −1 1 can be also regarded as an example of application in a 3×3 block non-symmetric context of the multigrid reduction framework [100,101], where fracture and body variables play the role of fine and coarse nodes, respectively, and H replaces H in matrix J.…”
Section: Methods No 1: T-p-u Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since we use a twofold approximation for T −1 , i.e., exact in L 1 , U 1 and inexact in S , M −1 1 can be regarded as a member of the mixed constraint preconditioner class [96][97][98]. Similarly, the upper and lower block triangular factors in (22) play the role of decoupling operators for the original multi-physics problem and are the outcome of the general-purpose algebraic procedure defined in [99]. Finally, M −1 1 can be also regarded as an example of application in a 3×3 block non-symmetric context of the multigrid reduction framework [100,101], where fracture and body variables play the role of fine and coarse nodes, respectively, and H replaces H in matrix J.…”
Section: Methods No 1: T-p-u Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the aperture and slippage between the contact surfaces drive the fluid flow in the fractures, while the pressure variation perturbs the stress state in the surrounding medium and influences the contact mechanics itself. To achieve the desired accuracy, large domains are usually required, with high resolution representations of geological structures and their heterogeneous properties [13,14], and, specifically, of faults and fracture networks [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. It is, therefore, natural to have a growing demand towards the development of sophisticated models of increasing size, which are computationally intensive and require better and better performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the theory behind the continuous geomechanical models is well established, the contact mechanics modeling is a quickly developing field. There are several discretization options, such as DFM (discrete fracture model) (Garipov et al., 2016; Karimi‐Fard et al., 2004), EDFM (embedded discrete fracture model) (Shakiba & Sepehrnoori, 2015; Wong et al., 2019), thin finite elements layers. Among them, we adopted the DFM, consisting in the explicit discretization of the fracture network through interface elements (IE).…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second class employs an embedding strategy, in which a continuum discretization scheme is enriched to capture discontinuities cutting through continuum elements. For example, Embedded Discrete Fracture Models (EDFM) introduce additional, local degrees of freedom to capture opening and sliding modes [19][20][21][22] while Extended Finite Elements Methods (XFEM) introduce global degrees of freedom for this purpose [20,[23][24][25][26]. A third class discards explicit discontinuity surfaces altogether, and instead represents a fracture via a regularized (smooth) field using a continuum discretization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%