2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of α-conotoxin unbinding using umbrella sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The umbrella sampling is more efficient than MD simulations for conformation sampling, and it has been frequently applied to predict the binding free energies of the conotoxins to their target proteins [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. In this study, umbrella sampling was used to predict the binding affinities of PIIIA against varied Na V subtypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The umbrella sampling is more efficient than MD simulations for conformation sampling, and it has been frequently applied to predict the binding free energies of the conotoxins to their target proteins [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. In this study, umbrella sampling was used to predict the binding affinities of PIIIA against varied Na V subtypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore this hypothesis, the binding interaction between the enzyme and metal ion was investigated for the wild type system and its C122A mutant. Thus, the binding energy of Mn(II) was derived from the potential of mean force (PMF) extracted from umbrella sampling simulations . Umbrella sampling is based on the idea that by running several restrained MD simulations in which each window explore a particular region along the reaction coordinate between two interacting species (ξ), the entire conformational space is sampled.…”
Section: Materials and Methods: In Silico Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case for ligand unbinding, where the time scale reaches up to several hours or days, and is thus too computationally expensive for a single unbiased MD simulation starting from the ligand bound conformation; nowadays it is possible to reach the millisecond time scale on specialized machines (Shaw et al 2009). Kinetic descriptions of binding and unbinding have been addressed by several diferent approaches, including, but not limited to, methods introducing an energy bias as a scalar in the potential energy equation of the system (Fukunishi et al 2002;Hamelberg et al 2004;Luitz and Zacharias 2014;Mollica et al 2015Mollica et al , 2016Pierce et al 2012;Sinko et al 2013;Wang et al 2013) and methods requiring a preliminary deinition of a set of collective variables (CVs) to be biased during the simulation (Barducci et al 2011;Bui et al 2003;Gervasio et al 2005;Guo et al 2016;Isralewitz et al 2001;Laio and Parrinello 2002;Laio et al 2005;Li 2005;Patel et al 2014;Torrie and Valleau 1977;Yu et al 2016). CVs can be for example intermolecular or interatomic distances, angles formed by atoms or group of atoms, coordination numbers, degree of solvation and they are used in order to drive the binding/unbinding transition and to map the corresponding energy proile.…”
Section: U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%