Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The main structure of the transmission tower consists of the tower body and the cross arm, which serve as vertical support and transverse extension, respectively. Compared with the tower body, due to the difference between the transverse and longitudinal projected areas of the cross-arm, the wind load distribution of the cross-arm is more complicated and requires more in-depth research. In this paper, wind tunnel force tests under skew wind were carried out on the 1:20 scaled rigid models of the tubular and the tubular-angle combined cross-arms. The tests consider four solidity ratios (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5) under three wind speeds and 19 yaw angles. The aerodynamic force coefficients Ci, the skewed wind load factor Kθ, the transversal and longitudinal wind load distribution factor nX and nY, and the angle α between the transversal aerodynamic force coefficient (CX) and the resultant wind force coefficient (CR) were obtained and analyzed. It was found that the wind load coefficients decrease with increasing solidity ratio. The tested drag coefficient of the tubular cross-arm is larger than the combined cross-arm under the same solidity ratio. The nX of the tubular and combined cross-arm reaches the maximum range of 0.33–0.47 and 0.22–0.23 at 30° <θ < 45° and 30° < θ < 35°, respectively. The nY curves were ordered from large to small as follows: EN 50341-1, the tested tubular cross-arm, the tested combined cross-arm, and JEC-127-1979. At 55° < θ < 65°, the difference of α and θ for the tested tubular and combined cross-arm reaches the maximum of 10°–18° and 29°–32°, respectively, indicating that the lift force cannot be ignored and the assumption α = θ is not applicable. Reasonable nonlinear fitting functions are proposed to accurately calculate the wind load of the two types of cross-arms.
The main structure of the transmission tower consists of the tower body and the cross arm, which serve as vertical support and transverse extension, respectively. Compared with the tower body, due to the difference between the transverse and longitudinal projected areas of the cross-arm, the wind load distribution of the cross-arm is more complicated and requires more in-depth research. In this paper, wind tunnel force tests under skew wind were carried out on the 1:20 scaled rigid models of the tubular and the tubular-angle combined cross-arms. The tests consider four solidity ratios (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5) under three wind speeds and 19 yaw angles. The aerodynamic force coefficients Ci, the skewed wind load factor Kθ, the transversal and longitudinal wind load distribution factor nX and nY, and the angle α between the transversal aerodynamic force coefficient (CX) and the resultant wind force coefficient (CR) were obtained and analyzed. It was found that the wind load coefficients decrease with increasing solidity ratio. The tested drag coefficient of the tubular cross-arm is larger than the combined cross-arm under the same solidity ratio. The nX of the tubular and combined cross-arm reaches the maximum range of 0.33–0.47 and 0.22–0.23 at 30° <θ < 45° and 30° < θ < 35°, respectively. The nY curves were ordered from large to small as follows: EN 50341-1, the tested tubular cross-arm, the tested combined cross-arm, and JEC-127-1979. At 55° < θ < 65°, the difference of α and θ for the tested tubular and combined cross-arm reaches the maximum of 10°–18° and 29°–32°, respectively, indicating that the lift force cannot be ignored and the assumption α = θ is not applicable. Reasonable nonlinear fitting functions are proposed to accurately calculate the wind load of the two types of cross-arms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.