2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on low-cycle fatigue performance of high-strength steel bars including the effect of inelastic buckling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in value of d l reduced the lateral displacement, as well as adherence slightly decreased; there was an evident influence on the buckling as a function of the relationship between the diameter and the length of the reinforcing steel, according to the works developed in this regard by Wu et al 2022, andWang et al 2022. The nominal d l analyzed #2, #3, #4, and #5.…”
Section: Longitudinal Reinforcing Steelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The increase in value of d l reduced the lateral displacement, as well as adherence slightly decreased; there was an evident influence on the buckling as a function of the relationship between the diameter and the length of the reinforcing steel, according to the works developed in this regard by Wu et al 2022, andWang et al 2022. The nominal d l analyzed #2, #3, #4, and #5.…”
Section: Longitudinal Reinforcing Steelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is interesting to note that observations from past earthquakes and experiments show that the buckling fracture of longitudinal rebar because of LCF is one of the common failure modes for flexural members (Aldabagh and Alam, 2021;Paul et al, 2014). Therefore, since the buckling and fracture of longitudinal rebars in RC elements lead to significant moment and strength degradation, many studies have been conducted on the effects of inelastic buckling on the LCF behavior of reinforcing steel (Aldabagh and Alam, 2021;Kashani et al, 2015aKashani et al, , 2015bTripathi et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steel bars are subjected to a high-strain, low-cycle repeated load, causing the reinforcements to fracture within 100–200 fatigue cycles [21]. Wu et al [22] studied the buckling and low-cycle fatigue performance of a high-strength steel bar (HSSB, HTRB600) and compared them with those of a normal steel bar (NSB, HRB400E). The test results indicated that the HTRB600 steel bars exhibited lower tensile ductility and more severe post-buckling softening and pinching effects than the HRB400E steel bars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%