2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-015-0757-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on Mechanical Behaviors of Sandstone with Two Preexisting Flaws under Triaxial Compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang et al [39] conducted conventional triaxial compression experiments on sandstone specimens with two closed nonoverlapping fissures. As shown in Figure 14, four types of sandstone specimens were tested.…”
Section: Biaxial and Triaxialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Huang et al [39] conducted conventional triaxial compression experiments on sandstone specimens with two closed nonoverlapping fissures. As shown in Figure 14, four types of sandstone specimens were tested.…”
Section: Biaxial and Triaxialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 mm 100mm Figure 14: Four types of tested sandstone specimen and geometry of two preexisting nonoverlapping filled flaws: type A is intact specimen; types B-D are specimens with two different preexisting flaws [39]. [122] investigated the effects of loading direction on failure load and failure modes for Brazilian tests on jointed coal rock.…”
Section: Tension Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the viewpoint of laboratory experiments, acoustic emission (AE), photographic monitoring, digital image correlation (DIC), and computed tomography (CT) scanning techniques are adopted to capture the crack evolution process in rock that contains pre-existing flaws under compression or tension. [12][13][14][15] From the view point of numerical simulation, crack initiation and coalescence process of rock is reproduced in RFPA3D, 16 FLAC, 17 AUTODYN, 18 FEMDEM, 19 NOSB-PD, 20 NMM, 21 GPD, 22 and particle flow code (PFC). 23 To simulate the loading-type failure of underground openings, Fakhimi et al 24 tested a sandstone specimen that contains a central hole under biaxial compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the continuum-based methods, finite element method (FEM), 16,17 finite difference method (FDM), 18 boundary element method (BEM), 19 extended finite element method (XFEM), [20][21][22] phantom node method, 23 strain softening elements, 24 and specific meshfree methods, [25][26][27] such as bond particle method (BPM), 28,29 peridynamics (PD), 30-33 smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), 34 and general particle dynamics (GPD), 35,36 were developed to investigate interlayers and crack problems. In terms of the discontinuum-based methods, distinct lattice spring model (DLSM), 37 discrete element method (DEM), [38][39][40][41][42] discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA), [43][44][45] and numerical manifold method (NMM) [46][47][48] were developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%