2011 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/appeec.2011.5748771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on Performance Influence of Maximum Thickness Position on Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Airfoil

Abstract: Airfoil geometric configuration is very important for aerodynamic performance of a straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbine (SB-VAWT). In recent study, Islam et al have pointed out old NACA-4 are not perfectly suited for SB-VAWT operating at low Reynolds number and special purpose airfoils is needed. Islam has singled out four required geometric features which would be suitable for SB-VAWT airfoil. However, the maximum thickness position, considered one of the important geometric parameters, was not involved… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The airfoils with different shapes and sizes had different lift and drag force, so nondimensional lift coefficient and drag coefficient were used usually to explore the pros and cons of airfoils [4]. The Figures (4) and (5) show the results of lift coefficient and drag coefficient for NACA4412 and TCB6612, respectively, which are carried out by FLUENT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The airfoils with different shapes and sizes had different lift and drag force, so nondimensional lift coefficient and drag coefficient were used usually to explore the pros and cons of airfoils [4]. The Figures (4) and (5) show the results of lift coefficient and drag coefficient for NACA4412 and TCB6612, respectively, which are carried out by FLUENT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these results, it can be found that the value of lift coefficient is increased about 17.7%. Figure (5) shows the drag coefficient of the NACA4412 is 0.00095 while the drag coefficient of TCB6612 is 0.001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At a small angle of attack, the stagnation point is the point at which the particles of air slowing down and at which they are divided into two, which are divided into two parts of surface. Figure 2.2 shows the streamline division produced from an increase of velocity at the upper surface, while the velocity decreases at the lower surface [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%