Investigation on plasma immersion ion implantation treated medical implants

Mändl, S.; Sader, Robert; Thorwarth, G.; Krause, Daniel; Zeilhofer, H.‐F.; Horch, Hans-Henning; Rauschenbach, B.

doi:10.1016/s1389-0344(02)00025-4

Cited by 65 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…AISI 316L), tantalum, niobium, cobalt chrome nickel alloys, titanium and titanium alloys. Mändl and co-workers [123] used oxygen PBII for Ti and titanium alloys to form a rutile surface layer on small rods, which were implanted into rat femurs to evaluate biocompatibility and osseointegration. Oxygen PBII with parameters 0.3 Pa O 2 , plasma formed by ECR microwave discharge, substrate biased with -30 kV pulses, 15 µs per pulse, 10 6 pulses, resulted in enhanced biocompatibility and osseointegration for pure Ti and to some degree improvements were found for NiTi alloy SM495.…”

Section: B Biomaterials and Carbon-based Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Plasma-based ion implantation and deposition: a review of physics, technology, and applications

Pelletier

Anders

2005

IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.

174

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After pioneering work in the 1980s, plasma-based ion implantation (PBII) and plasma-based ion implantation and deposition (PBIID) can now be considered mature technologies for surface modification and thin film deposition. This review starts by looking at the historical development and recalling the basic ideas of PBII. Advantages and disadvantages are compared to conventional ion beam implantation and physical vapor deposition for PBII and PBIID, respectively, followed by a summary of the physics of sheath dynamics, plasma and pulse specifications, plasma diagnostics, and process modelling. The review moves on to technology considerations for plasma sources and process reactors. PBII surface modification and PBIID coatings are applied in a wide range of situations. They include the by-now traditional tribological applications of reducing wear and corrosion through the formation of hard, tough, smooth, low-friction and chemically inert phases and coatings, e.g. for engine components. PBII has become viable for the formation of shallow junctions and other applications in microelectronics. More recently, the rapidly growing field of biomaterial synthesis makes used 1 of PBII&D to produce surgical implants, bio-and blood-compatible surfaces and coatings, etc.With limitations, also non-conducting materials such as plastic sheets can be treated. The major interest in PBII processing originates from its flexibility in ion energy (from a few eV up to about 100 keV), and the capability to efficiently treat, or deposit on, large areas, and (within limits) to process non-flat, three-dimensional workpieces, including forming and modifying metastable phases and nanostructures.We use the acronym PBII&D when referring to both implantation and deposition, while PBIID implies that deposition is part of the process.2

show abstract

Section: B Biomaterials and Carbon-based Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Plasma-based ion implantation and deposition: a review of physics, technology, and applications

Pelletier

Anders

2005

IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.

174

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several solutions to this problem have been proposed. Improvements in the tribological properties of stainless steel achieved by ion implantation have been widely described elsewhere [1][2][3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tribological behavior of PIII treated AISI 316 L austenitic stainless steel against UHMWPE counterface

Saklakoğlu

Short

et al. 2006

Wear

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…TiO 2 coatings were produced by sol-gel [37], sputtering [31], chemical vapor deposition [38,39], atomic layer deposition [40], plasma immersion ion implantation [41], and cathodic arc deposition techniques [42,43]. If the vaporization is primarily from the cathode surface by arc erosion, this system is called a cathodic arc source [34].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relative Contributions of Surface Roughness and Crystalline Structure to the Biocompatibility of Titanium Nitride and Titanium Oxide Coatings Deposited by PVD and TPS Coatings

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was conducted to characterize titanium (Ti) metal surfaces modified by polishing, coating with titanium nitride, coating with titanium oxide, sandblasting with alumina (Al 2 O 3 ) particles and coating with titanium oxide, coating with titanium plasma spray (TPS); and to evaluate the effect of surface roughness and crystalline structure on adhesion of human fetal osteoblast cells (CRL-11372) in vitro after 24 hours. Surface topography and roughness were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a noncontacting optical profilometer, respectively. The crystalline structures of the coatings were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). CRL-11372 cells were incubated at these surfaces for 24 h and were evaluated for their mean total cell counts and cell viabilities. Cell morphologies were examined qualitatively by SEM images. Glass discs served as control group (CG) for the cell culture experiments. Surfaces at the Group TPS had the highest and values. Highest mean total cell counts were found for the CG. SC (sandblasted and TiO 2 coated) surfaces had shown sparsely oriented CRL-11372 cells while other surfaces and CG showed confluency. Surfaces displayed diverse crystalline structures. Crystalline structures led to different cellular adhesion responses among the groups regardless of the surface roughness values.

show abstract

Investigation on plasma immersion ion implantation treated medical implants

Cited by 65 publications

References 22 publications

Plasma-based ion implantation and deposition: a review of physics, technology, and applications

Plasma-based ion implantation and deposition: a review of physics, technology, and applications

Tribological behavior of PIII treated AISI 316 L austenitic stainless steel against UHMWPE counterface

Relative Contributions of Surface Roughness and Crystalline Structure to the Biocompatibility of Titanium Nitride and Titanium Oxide Coatings Deposited by PVD and TPS Coatings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About