2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2023.105953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on selective separation of oxygen-containing compounds in lignite and sub-bitumite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5 , the peak intensity of C 1s increases in the order of NL < NL CH-R < NL BE-R < NL EA-R , while the peak intensity of O 1s is exactly the opposite, aligning with the elemental analysis findings. According to references [ 4 , 15 , 17 , 24 , 25 ], the binding energies of C 1s at 284.0 eV, 285.6 eV, 287.3 eV and 288.7 eV correspond to C−C, C−H, C=O, and COO, respectively. Table 3 reveals that the dominant form of C 1s on the surface of the four samples is C−C, while O 1s is mainly in the form of C=O and C−O, primarily existing as phenols, alcohols, and esters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure 5 , the peak intensity of C 1s increases in the order of NL < NL CH-R < NL BE-R < NL EA-R , while the peak intensity of O 1s is exactly the opposite, aligning with the elemental analysis findings. According to references [ 4 , 15 , 17 , 24 , 25 ], the binding energies of C 1s at 284.0 eV, 285.6 eV, 287.3 eV and 288.7 eV correspond to C−C, C−H, C=O, and COO, respectively. Table 3 reveals that the dominant form of C 1s on the surface of the four samples is C−C, while O 1s is mainly in the form of C=O and C−O, primarily existing as phenols, alcohols, and esters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of C 1s indicate that, compared to the original coal, the C=O content of NL decreased from 10.54% to 5.18%, 6.82%, and 5.67% after thermal dissolution with CH, BE, and EA, respectively, while the COO content increased from 4.01% to 4.59%, 4.20%, and 4.61%, respectively. This may be due to the destruction of oxygen bridges (such as C=O) in the coal sample during thermal dissolution in the presence of EA, leading to the formation of esters and carboxylic acid compounds [ 15 , 26 ]. Additionally, during the thermal dissolution processes with CH and BE at 300 °C, the capsule structure [ 27 ] in NL was disrupted, releasing some small OCOCs, with some C=O-containing compounds dissolving in CH and BE, while some COO-containing compounds were retained in the coal sample structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations