2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10134-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on surface sulfate attack of nanoparticle-modified fly ash concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lv et al [12] studied the sulfate corrosion resistance and mechanism of silica fume-reinforced cement mortar. Vishwakarma et al [13] separately incorporated fly ash and nano-TiO 2 into concrete to compare and analyze the sulfate erosion resistance and found that the fly ash concrete had better sulfate erosion resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lv et al [12] studied the sulfate corrosion resistance and mechanism of silica fume-reinforced cement mortar. Vishwakarma et al [13] separately incorporated fly ash and nano-TiO 2 into concrete to compare and analyze the sulfate erosion resistance and found that the fly ash concrete had better sulfate erosion resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars believe that hydration products can react with sulfate attack medium to form insoluble gypsum [ 33 ]. When the attack medium is NaSO 4 and the attack age is short, NaOH as a by-product of the reaction can ensure the continuity of high alkalinity in a concrete system [ 34 ], which plays a vital role in the stability of C–S–H at the interface, and improves the performance of the interface area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the residual compressive strength of co exposed to sulphate attack, the lower the weight loss. However, a study by Vishwakarma et al [102] reported that when subjec ammonium and sodium sulphate solutions, concrete structures containing nanopa were shown to be less resistant to sulphate attack than fly ash-modified concrete. However, a study by Vishwakarma et al [102] reported that when subjected to ammonium and sodium sulphate solutions, concrete structures containing nanoparticles were shown to be less resistant to sulphate attack than fly ash-modified concrete.…”
Section: Sulphate Resistance Of Concrete Enhanced With Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%