2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on the properties of a new type of concrete blocks incorporated with PEG/SiO2 composite phase change material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermal conductivity value of 70-wt% PEG/DPMS was 0.491 W/(m·K), which was 1.89 times larger than that of the pure PEG (0.260 W/(m·K)), and moreover, the thermal conductivity value of 70-wt% PEG/DPMS was larger than that of PEG/SiO 2 /MWCNT (0.463 W/(m·K)), 40 PEG/SiO 2 (0.359 W/(m·K)), 41 PEG/ASB (0.251 W/(m·K), and PEG/ASB CPCMs (0.303 W/(m·K)). The thermal conductivity value of 70-wt% PEG/DPMS was 0.491 W/(m·K), which was 1.89 times larger than that of the pure PEG (0.260 W/(m·K)), and moreover, the thermal conductivity value of 70-wt% PEG/DPMS was larger than that of PEG/SiO 2 /MWCNT (0.463 W/(m·K)), 40 PEG/SiO 2 (0.359 W/(m·K)), 41 PEG/ASB (0.251 W/(m·K), and PEG/ASB CPCMs (0.303 W/(m·K)).…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Of Peg/dpms Compositesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thermal conductivity value of 70-wt% PEG/DPMS was 0.491 W/(m·K), which was 1.89 times larger than that of the pure PEG (0.260 W/(m·K)), and moreover, the thermal conductivity value of 70-wt% PEG/DPMS was larger than that of PEG/SiO 2 /MWCNT (0.463 W/(m·K)), 40 PEG/SiO 2 (0.359 W/(m·K)), 41 PEG/ASB (0.251 W/(m·K), and PEG/ASB CPCMs (0.303 W/(m·K)). The thermal conductivity value of 70-wt% PEG/DPMS was 0.491 W/(m·K), which was 1.89 times larger than that of the pure PEG (0.260 W/(m·K)), and moreover, the thermal conductivity value of 70-wt% PEG/DPMS was larger than that of PEG/SiO 2 /MWCNT (0.463 W/(m·K)), 40 PEG/SiO 2 (0.359 W/(m·K)), 41 PEG/ASB (0.251 W/(m·K), and PEG/ASB CPCMs (0.303 W/(m·K)).…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Of Peg/dpms Compositesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thermal conductivity value is one of the essential parameters of PCMs, and high thermal conductivity could shorten the heat absorption and release time and then enhance the heat storage efficiency of PCMs. The thermal conductivity value of 70-wt% PEG/DPMS was 0.491 W/(m·K), which was 1.89 times larger than that of the pure PEG (0.260 W/(m·K)), and moreover, the thermal conductivity value of 70-wt% PEG/DPMS was larger than that of PEG/SiO 2 /MWCNT (0.463 W/(m·K)), 40 PEG/SiO 2 (0.359 W/(m·K)), 41 PEG/ASB (0.251 W/(m·K), and PEG/ASB CPCMs (0.303 W/(m·K)). 42 Therefore, the supporter of DPMS could increase the thermal conductivity value of PEG significantly, and PEG/DPMS possessed great potential in practical applications.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Of Peg/dpms Compositesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The maximum melting enthalpy was achieved by PEG4000 at approximately 202.1 J/g. Next, Xu et al . investigated the feasibility of PEG/SiO 2 composites in concrete blocks to reduce the energy requirements of building with a melting temperature of 28 °C and a latent heat of 113.6 kJ kg −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oruc 15 investigated a (PCM)‐embedded radiant wall heating system with different kinds of PCMs and found out that a commercially available PCM with a melting point at 26°C leads to a significant increase in both energy and exergy efficiency. Concrete blocks designed by Xu et al 16 contained 7.5% of a form‐stable PEG/SiO 2 composite PCM and Voelker 17 equipped a lightweight building test room with PCM. Overall, they compared paraffin and a salt hydrate mixture based on CaCl*6H 2 O and achieved a reduction of the indoor peak temperature of 4 K with a combination of both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%