2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on the removal of SO 3 in ammonia-based WFGD system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to avoid sulfuric acid aerosols condensing in the sampling probe, the flue gas was first heated to a temperature above the acid dew point (180 °C) and then cooled down to completely condense in the spiral condenser. In the spiral condenser, the temperature of circulating cooling water was set at 60 °C . This temperature would be higher than the water dew point and lower than the acid dew point.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to avoid sulfuric acid aerosols condensing in the sampling probe, the flue gas was first heated to a temperature above the acid dew point (180 °C) and then cooled down to completely condense in the spiral condenser. In the spiral condenser, the temperature of circulating cooling water was set at 60 °C . This temperature would be higher than the water dew point and lower than the acid dew point.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to mitigate the emission of SO 3 or sulfuric acid aerosols, many control methods have been proposed, such as injecting alkaline matter into flue gas, upgrading the electrostatic precipitator (ESP) to low‐temperature ESP, optimizing the parameters of the WFGD system and installing a wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) system . These control methods have been proven effective and many of them have been implemented in power plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wet desulfurization tower is widely used to remove SO 2 in power plant. The removal efficiency of SO 2 can reach over 98%, and several CFPs, such as sulfuric acid aerosols, 18 sulfate aerosols, 15 and volatile organic compounds, 22 can be removed simultaneously; 6 however, the removal efficiency is generally less than 70%. Given that the removal mechanism of SO 2 in the wet desulfurization tower is gas−liquid mass transfer absorption, trapping of CFPs is based on Brownian diffusion, truncation, and collision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the cooling effect of the spraying liquid and the high humidity in WFGD, most of the SO 3 would be in the form of sulfuric acid aerosols. Huang et al and Pan et al , adopted an ammonia- and a limestone–gypsum-based WFGD, respectively, to investigate the formation and removal of sulfuric acid aerosols in a pilot-scale plant. It was found that the sulfuric acid aerosols, usually with a particle size less than 0.1 μm, were generated via homogenous nucleation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%