2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2020.412079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on the structural, magnetic, dielectric and impedance analysis of Mg0.3-Ba Cu0.2Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coercivity is found to consist of contributions due to the magneto‐crystalline anisotropy (related to the anisotropy constant), shape anisotropy (related to the shape of the grains), magnetoelastic anisotropy (related to the internal stresses), and surface anisotropy (related to the reduced symmetry) 59 . Therefore, the total anisotropy energy ( K eff V ) corresponds to the energy barrier for reversing the magnetization is written as follows 60 : KeffVbadbreak=Eshapegoodbreak+Esurfacegoodbreak+EMEgoodbreak+EMC$$\begin{equation}{K}_{eff}V = {E}_{shape} + {E}_{surface} + {E}_{ME} + {E}_{MC}\end{equation}$$where E shape is the shape anisotropy, E surface is surface anisotropy, E ME is magnetoelastic anisotropy, and E ME is magneto‐crystalline anisotropy. The anisotropy constant ( K 1 ) can be determined by the anisotropy field ( H a ) and the saturation magnetization ( M s ) as follows: K1badbreak=HaMs2$$\begin{equation} {K}_1 = \frac{{{H}_a{M}_s}}{2} \end{equation}$$where H a is proportional to b calculated from the LAS method 61 : Habadbreak=15b$$\begin{equation}{H}_a = \sqrt {15b} \end{equation}$$…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coercivity is found to consist of contributions due to the magneto‐crystalline anisotropy (related to the anisotropy constant), shape anisotropy (related to the shape of the grains), magnetoelastic anisotropy (related to the internal stresses), and surface anisotropy (related to the reduced symmetry) 59 . Therefore, the total anisotropy energy ( K eff V ) corresponds to the energy barrier for reversing the magnetization is written as follows 60 : KeffVbadbreak=Eshapegoodbreak+Esurfacegoodbreak+EMEgoodbreak+EMC$$\begin{equation}{K}_{eff}V = {E}_{shape} + {E}_{surface} + {E}_{ME} + {E}_{MC}\end{equation}$$where E shape is the shape anisotropy, E surface is surface anisotropy, E ME is magnetoelastic anisotropy, and E ME is magneto‐crystalline anisotropy. The anisotropy constant ( K 1 ) can be determined by the anisotropy field ( H a ) and the saturation magnetization ( M s ) as follows: K1badbreak=HaMs2$$\begin{equation} {K}_1 = \frac{{{H}_a{M}_s}}{2} \end{equation}$$where H a is proportional to b calculated from the LAS method 61 : Habadbreak=15b$$\begin{equation}{H}_a = \sqrt {15b} \end{equation}$$…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coercivity is found to consist of contributions due to the magneto-crystalline anisotropy (related to the anisotropy constant), shape anisotropy (related to the shape of the grains), magnetoelastic anisotropy (related to the internal stresses), and surface anisotropy (related to the reduced symmetry). 59 Therefore, the total anisotropy energy (K eff V) corresponds to the energy barrier for reversing the magnetization is written as follows 60 :…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E 4 is correlated to the atomic structures of the crystal host and presents preferential directions for the magnetization. Therefore, the nonmonotonous variations in coercive fields are resulted from the contribution of the three anisotropy energies, namely surface anisotropy ( E 2 ), magnetoelastic anisotropy ( E 3 ), and magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy ( E 4 ), for both sets of prepared samples of H-CoErSm NSFs and S-CoErSm NSFs …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong bands observed at around 660 cm -1 and 545 cm -1 are originated from stretching vibration of the Mn-O bond lengths and bending vibrations bond of O-B-O bond angles in octahedron BO 6 of SrMnO 3 perovskite structure, respectively (Esmaili and Gholizadeh 2020;Gholizadeh 2019;Gholizadeh and Malekzadeh 2017). The positions of two strong bands observed at around 580 cm -1 and 450 cm -1 are assigned to vibrations of the metaloxygen in tetrahedral and octahedral sites of spinel cubic structure, respectively (Gholizadeh and Beyranvand 2020;Gholizadeh 2017). There are two peaks located at 3100 and 3400 cm -1 that are attributed to O-H bond stretching.…”
Section: Ft-ir Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%