Investigation Relational Levels of Intensity between Paternalistic and Servant Leadership Styles and National Culture, Organizational Commitment and Subordinate Responses or Reactions to the Leaders Style

The effect of organizational culture on the organizational commitment: Evidence from hotel industry

“…This refers to the employees who belong to the collectivist culture where the group objective is considered by the individual as priority (Hofsted et al, 2005). In conclusion, this research model explains only 59% of the variance in organizational commitment, which means that there are other factors that may have an effect on the organizational commitment in addition to organizational culture, such as performance (Al-Matari & Bin Omira, 2015;Abdul Rashid et al, 2003;Gelade & Young, 2005), satisfaction (Yousef, 2000;Li, 2004;Lok & Crawford, 2004, Manetje & Martins, 2009Huey Yiing, & Zaman Bin Ahmad, 2009;leadership Lok & Crawford, 2004;Li, 2004;Acar, 2012;Top et al, 2015;Gokce et al, 2014;Zhu et al, 2011;Daft, 2005;Lok & Crawford, 2004;Silverthorne, 2004).…”

“…In the same context but in different field which is education, the samples were collected from five universities in Turkey. Top et al (2015), tested the relationship between number of factors which are, paternalistic and servant leadership styles and national culture, organizational commitment and subordinate responses or reactions to the leaders' style. They confirmed that the most significant relationship within these factors is the association between the national cultural reflection on the leadership and the organizational commitment.…”

A content analysis of servant leadership studies

“…They attempt to focus on their followers' expectations and needs rather than their own selves (Coşkunlar, 2011). According to Spears (1996), based on teamwork and community, servant-leaders respect and involve their followers in decision making and planning processes (Top, Öğe, Atan, & Gümüş, 2015). Serving the followers is the most important aspect of the servant leadership (Chen, Chen, & Li, 2013).…”

Measuring the Readiness of Administrative Leaders to Adopt the Servant Leadership Philosophy: Exploratory Study in Karbala University

“…6) Ethical responsibility (actions and ethical thinking). Top et al (2015) referred to that Servant leadership acquires broad audience formation's organizations. The interest in Servant Leadership feeds from the changes that occur in a workplace and community.…”