2019
DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2019.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations at Naḥal Roded 110: a Late Neolithic ritual site in the southern Negev

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wide range of aquatic, game birds and raptors at WF16 is similar to that at Epipalaeolithic and contemporary PPNA sites in the southern Levant (Simmons, 2004;Simmons & Nadel, 1998) (Bangsgaard, 2008) while Nahel Roded II in the southern Negev has an assemblage dominated by Accipitridae, with the European honey buzzard most prevalent (Birkenfeld et al, 2019). Both assemblages have been interpreted as deriving from hunting birds on their spring and autumn migrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wide range of aquatic, game birds and raptors at WF16 is similar to that at Epipalaeolithic and contemporary PPNA sites in the southern Levant (Simmons, 2004;Simmons & Nadel, 1998) (Bangsgaard, 2008) while Nahel Roded II in the southern Negev has an assemblage dominated by Accipitridae, with the European honey buzzard most prevalent (Birkenfeld et al, 2019). Both assemblages have been interpreted as deriving from hunting birds on their spring and autumn migrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…While an interest in raptors is evident at the early Epipalaeolithic site of Ohalo (Simmons & Nadel, 1998), WF16's focus on raptors at WF16 is shared with later (PPNB) Neolithic sites. At Shkarat Msaied, 30 km south from WF16, 295 of the 300 avian bird bones were from raptors (Bangsgaard, 2008) while Nahel Roded II in the southern Negev has an assemblage dominated by Accipitridae, with the European honey buzzard most prevalent (Birkenfeld et al, 2019). Both assemblages have been interpreted as deriving from hunting birds on their spring and autumn migrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This encompasses a large proportion of published avifaunal assemblages spanning the timeframe when human societal groups shifted from hunting towards agriculture. Important PPNB assemblages have not yet been fully published so inclusion of this period awaits reports on sites such Nahal Roded (Birkenfeld et al 2019(Birkenfeld et al , 2020. Figure 7 shows location of sites included in the analysis as well as secondary sites mentioned but not included in the statistical analysis as they are outside the geographical focus of this analysis or only a small number of bird bones were identi ed (<20).…”
Section: Scope Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%