2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.11.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations for the use of the fast digitizers with detectors for radiative capture measurements at GELINA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible bias effects due to such corrections are very small as was demonstrated in refs. [30,43]. However, it limits the upper energy region of the data obtained at the 12 m station to ≤ 70 keV for measurements without the sulfur permanent filter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Possible bias effects due to such corrections are very small as was demonstrated in refs. [30,43]. However, it limits the upper energy region of the data obtained at the 12 m station to ≤ 70 keV for measurements without the sulfur permanent filter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In refs. [11,21] it was shown that uncertainties for such dead time corrections are very small and can be neglected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with calibration sources, given in [6] [7] [15] have shown that the dead-time correction obtained by this method is correct to a fraction of one percent. In a recent comparison [16] of fast digitizers with a small dead time and a conventional system using a fixed dead time a systematic discrepancy of 2 % was observed for a dead-time correction factor of 0.45 in the conventional system in the extreme case of a saturated resonance in a neutron capture experiment.…”
Section: Dead-time Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%