1931
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-6963(31)80070-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations into the inheritance of orthodontic malformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1935
1935
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Familial occurrence of class II/division 2 deep-bite has been attested in several literature publishments including twin and triplet reports by Kloeppel, [6] Markovic [7] and Litt and Nielsen [8] and pedigree studies by Korkhaus [9] and Trauner. [10] Peck et al [11] declared that these studies points to indisputable genetic influence, probably of an autosomal dominant type with incomplete penetrance, as a critical element in the formation and expression of Angle's class II/division 2 deep-bite malocclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familial occurrence of class II/division 2 deep-bite has been attested in several literature publishments including twin and triplet reports by Kloeppel, [6] Markovic [7] and Litt and Nielsen [8] and pedigree studies by Korkhaus [9] and Trauner. [10] Peck et al [11] declared that these studies points to indisputable genetic influence, probably of an autosomal dominant type with incomplete penetrance, as a critical element in the formation and expression of Angle's class II/division 2 deep-bite malocclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 Extensive cephalometric studies by Harris suggested the concept of polygenic inheritance for Class II division 1 malocclusion, showing that the craniofacial skeletal patterns of children with class II malocclusions are heritable and that there is a high resemblance to the skeletal patterns in their siblings with normal occlusion. 48 Familial occurrence of Class II division 2 has been documented in several published reports including twin and triplet studies (Kloeppel; Markovic) and family pedigrees from Korkhaus, Rubbrecht, Trauner, 49 and Peck et al 50 Twin studies showed that the identical twins demonstrated 100% concordance for Class II division 2 malocclusion, indicating a strong genetic influence in the development of Class II division 2 deep bite malocclusions. 51 Markovic's clinical and cephalometric study of intra-and interpair comparisons of 114 Class II division 2 malocclusions, 48 twin pairs, and six sets of triplets showed complete penetrance and variable expressivity of autosomal dominant genetic impression.…”
Section: Effects Of Genetics On Inheritance Of Malocclusionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the 1930s, a German orthodontist and a Belgian physician introduced the orthodontic community to the idea developed in quantitative population genetics that the study of twins provides a unique approach to separate the relative contributions of heredity and environment to physical constitution. 33,36 From that point on, during the late 1930s and throughout the 1950s, much of orthodontic research focused on family pedigrees and especially on the study of twins from the perspectives of Mendelian genetics. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Virtually all of those studies tended to support the newly popular opinion that heredity determines the size and shape of the jaws in both normal and abnormal development and growth.…”
Section: Concepts Of Heredity and Genetics In Orthodonticsmentioning
confidence: 99%