2009 Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/dicta.2009.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations into the Robustness of Audio-Visual Gender Classification to Background Noise and Illumination Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This number, 86%, is very similar to that reported by the authors in their paper 83% (Stewart et al, 2009). Although the performance of this classifier is reasonably high, it must be noticed that, since it is the only sensor evaluating gender, an error in the gender recognition cannot be corrected by further reasoning.…”
Section: Video Analytics Performacesupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This number, 86%, is very similar to that reported by the authors in their paper 83% (Stewart et al, 2009). Although the performance of this classifier is reasonably high, it must be noticed that, since it is the only sensor evaluating gender, an error in the gender recognition cannot be corrected by further reasoning.…”
Section: Video Analytics Performacesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Both PCA and SVM system is a label with the gender of the passenger as well as a confidence value or probability of the face as being either male or female. The accuracy of this video analytic module was reported to be 83% in an independent testing (Stewart et al, 2009). …”
Section: The Computer Vision Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these applications in mind and with improvements in computational ability and classification algorithms there has been a good deal of recent interest in visual-based automatic gender classification systems. Much of the work has been concerned with full faces [1][2][3][4], although promising results have also been obtained using alternative representations such as gait [5] or full body images [6] and even hands [7]. It is understood, however, that individuals under surveillance by CCTV are not always cooperative (knowingly or unknowingly) and it may be difficult to capture certain traits cleanly in video footage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%