1995
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(95)00377-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations of the adsorption dynamics of D 2 on Si(100)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Already from these old data one may deduce that the room-temperature sticking coefficient on the terraces of the Si filaments is less than 10 Ϫ8 . Later, Schulze 12 based on a molecular-beam experiment with nozzle temperatures between 300 and 1000 K. The effective Arrhenius energy describing the surface temperature dependence of their sticking coefficient in the range 300 K ϽT s Ͻ650 K is less than 0.1 eV. This rather weak dependence of the sticking coefficient on surface temperature stands in marked contrast to results of the present work (E a ϭ0.7 eV͒.…”
Section: ϫ9contrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Already from these old data one may deduce that the room-temperature sticking coefficient on the terraces of the Si filaments is less than 10 Ϫ8 . Later, Schulze 12 based on a molecular-beam experiment with nozzle temperatures between 300 and 1000 K. The effective Arrhenius energy describing the surface temperature dependence of their sticking coefficient in the range 300 K ϽT s Ͻ650 K is less than 0.1 eV. This rather weak dependence of the sticking coefficient on surface temperature stands in marked contrast to results of the present work (E a ϭ0.7 eV͒.…”
Section: ϫ9contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Although the reasons for these discrepancies are currently still unclear, it should be kept in mind that the beam experiment lacked the sensitivity to measure sticking coefficients below 5ϫ10 Ϫ6 . 12 For a more detailed comparison of our Si͑100͒ data with the measurements of Kolasinski et al, see Ref. 8.…”
Section: ϫ9mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…adsorption does the H 2 molecule have to overcome an activation barrier, E * ad . Examples are coinage metal surfaces (Cu, Ag, Au), where barriers of up to 50 kJ mol -1 have been determined [11] and other free electron' metals (alkali, alkaline earth and earth metals) or various elemental semiconductor surfaces (Si, Ge) with barriers of similar height [12,13]. Even more illustrative is a two-dimensional representation of the homolytic dissociation reaction (elbow' plot), see Fig.…”
Section: The Principles Of the Interaction Of Hydrogen With Surfaces:mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the assumption of such a large barrier is in conflict with the known desorption activation energy [5,6] and the estimated bond strength of hydrogen atoms to silicon surface atoms [7]. Moreover, recent experiments have demonstrated that the desorbing molecules do not carry away a large amount of excess energy as translational energy [8] nor in their internal degrees of freedrom [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%