1990
DOI: 10.1016/0045-6535(90)90132-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations of the evaporation of selected pesticides from natural and model surfaces in field and laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A Japanese study in the 1970s reported using 10 kg Lindane ha )1 applied yearly to field plots , while an application rate of 0.15 kg Lindane ha )1 was reported as normal in the 1980s by Boehncke et al (1990). The majority of remaining sources have cited typical application rates of Lindane, from the 1960s to present, that range from 1 to 6 kg ha )1 , or 1 to 15 mg kg )1 soil (Bharati et al 1998;Bintein & Devillers 1996;Doelman et al 1990;MacRae et al 1967;Martinez-Toledo et al 1993;Waliszewski 1993).…”
Section: Hch Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Japanese study in the 1970s reported using 10 kg Lindane ha )1 applied yearly to field plots , while an application rate of 0.15 kg Lindane ha )1 was reported as normal in the 1980s by Boehncke et al (1990). The majority of remaining sources have cited typical application rates of Lindane, from the 1960s to present, that range from 1 to 6 kg ha )1 , or 1 to 15 mg kg )1 soil (Bharati et al 1998;Bintein & Devillers 1996;Doelman et al 1990;MacRae et al 1967;Martinez-Toledo et al 1993;Waliszewski 1993).…”
Section: Hch Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption and its dependence on soil moisture is the most important factor reducing volatilization from soil (3,5,6). Due to adsorption, volatilization from soils is generally much lower compared to volatilization from plants (7)(8)(9). Although the sorption capacity of plant surfaces is considered to be much lower compared to soil, it has to be emphasized that plant surfaces are interfering surfaces since absorption into and uptake through the cuti cle are processes antagonistic to pesticide volatilization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition substances can be adsorbed on to soil surfaces which will tend to reduce evaporation, e.g. it has been shown that as soil surfaces dry volatilisation slows due to increased adsorption [36], whilst on plant surfaces, especially from relatively rough leaves such as bean and wheat plants, evaporation can be significantly more important when compared to evaporation from soil [37][38][39], Leaf wax can also have an effect on volatilisation as the more lipophilic pesticides will tend to be dissolved in it [40,41], Pesticides will also occur bound to small particles or in aerosols in the atmosphere as a result of spray drift or wind erosion of treated soil. Thus, the use of vapour pressure or even of the Henry's Law Constant cannot be used alone to predict the occurrence of pesticides in the atmosphere.…”
Section: Commission On Agrochemicals and The Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have been carried out under laboratory and simulated field conditions [39,[42][43][44] to simulate volatilization of pesticides under true field conditions. Similarly, studies have also been carried out under controlled conditions in the field [24,45], Laboratory and field procedures for assessment of the inherent tendency of pesticides to volatilise into the air have also been proposed [46] and compared [47,48], Whilst these types of studies can provide a means of evaluating the effects of various microclimatic parameters they are not easy to carry out, particularly for pesticides with low volatility, and results must be interpreted with care.…”
Section: Commission On Agrochemicals and The Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%