2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on deformation mechanism of double-sided incremental sheet forming with synchronous thermomechanical steel-aluminum alloy bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interfacial pressure P and equivalent strain illustrated in Fig. 4 can also be calculated by the combination of forming parameters as stated in our previous work [24]. Therefore, by submitting specific forming parameters into Eq.…”
Section: Criterion For Predicting Bonding Quality Under Thermomechanical Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The interfacial pressure P and equivalent strain illustrated in Fig. 4 can also be calculated by the combination of forming parameters as stated in our previous work [24]. Therefore, by submitting specific forming parameters into Eq.…”
Section: Criterion For Predicting Bonding Quality Under Thermomechanical Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, the normal stress components σ t , σ  , and σ  are main driven sources of the element along the thickness, tangential and circumferential directions, respectively. Details on the deformation mechanisms can be referred to our previous work [24]. As materials undergo incremental plastic deformation and fast interfacial diffusion, the complex material behaviors are macroscopically characterized as sheet thinning and bonding.…”
Section: Dissimilar Sheets Deformation In Current Loading Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Better formability and a lower bumping height on the stack centre were obtained for the steel top/aluminium bottom sequence with a climbing direction of forming (the direction of the feed rate was the same as the tool rotation at the contact zone) [245]. The process has been extended to the double-sided incremental forming variant [246]; the authors carried out a model predicting the bonding quality and they also reduced profile deviation by 3.8 mm compared to single point forming [247]. Riaz et al [29] focused on comparing two temper conditions of AA2219 O (fully annealed) and T6 (solution heat treated and artificially aged).…”
Section: Friction-assisted Isfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding to the interfacial materials bonding response in elevated temperature condition, interfacial pressure P and yield stress σ O S of AA5052 are treated as dependent on current working temperature [24].…”
Section: Criterion For Predicting Bonding Quality Under Thermomechanical Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%