1958
DOI: 10.1007/bf01394155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on the determination of the available manganese content of soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1960
1960
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The suspensions were then filtered and Mn in the filtrates measured by AAS, using an aidacetylene flame and standards prepared in the appropriate extractant. (i) Exchangeable Mn was determined with either M CH3COONH4 (NH40Ac) adjusted to pH 7.0 (Leeper, 1947), M Mg(N03)2 (Boken, 1958) or M Zn(NO&. (ii) EDTA extractable Mn was determined with a 1% solution of HNaCaEDTA in M NH40Ac at pH 8.0 (Beckwith, 1955).…”
Section: Exchangeable Extractable and Reducible M Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suspensions were then filtered and Mn in the filtrates measured by AAS, using an aidacetylene flame and standards prepared in the appropriate extractant. (i) Exchangeable Mn was determined with either M CH3COONH4 (NH40Ac) adjusted to pH 7.0 (Leeper, 1947), M Mg(N03)2 (Boken, 1958) or M Zn(NO&. (ii) EDTA extractable Mn was determined with a 1% solution of HNaCaEDTA in M NH40Ac at pH 8.0 (Beckwith, 1955).…”
Section: Exchangeable Extractable and Reducible M Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CH 3 COONH 4 extracts at the pH of the extractant, Mg (NO 3 ) 2 is likely to extract at the pH of the soil (Boken, 1958). Thus, Mg(NO 3 ) 2 -extractable Mn is probably a better measure of exchangeable Mn than is CH 3 COONH 4 -extractableMn at pH 7 because a portion of the exchangeable Mn in the CH 3 COONH 4 system may be oxidized to an insoluble form at this high pH.…”
Section: Relationship Between Mn Tests and Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For soils with diverse properties, total soil Mn has proved an inadequate predictor of Mn uptake by plants (Mulder & Gerretsen, 1952). Soil content of exchangeable Mn is often related directly to Mn uptake (Piper, 1931;Steenbjerg, 1935;Heintze, 1938) and has generally correlated closely with the incidence of Mn deficiency in plants (Sherman & Harmer, 1943;Dion, Mann & Heintze, 1947;Boken, 1958). However, the variability associated with predicting available Mn from an exchangeable Mn test often limits its complete acceptance when applied to a group of soils developed under differing environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die groRe Bedeutung des Austausch-Mangans (nach der zwar nicht ganz exakten, aber ublichen Definition schlieRt das Austausch-Mangan dds Mangan der Bodenlosung, das in den meisten Boden nur einen kleinen Bruchteil davon ausmacht, ein) wurde zuerst von Steenbjerg (1933) erkannt und in vielen Arbeiten anderer Autoren bestatigt, SO z. B. von Heintze (1946) und neuerdings wieder von Schachtschabel (1956Schachtschabel ( und 1953 und yon Boken (1958). E r h s o n (1953) Fur die praktische Bodeiiuntersuchung zur Ermittlung de.s Mangnn-Versorgungssgrades (Einzellieiten: siehe Original'arbeit) resultiert aus den Untersuchungen, dal3 sowohl bei den Braunerden Ostholsteins als auch bei den Fehmarnboden mit Hilfe dcr angegebenen Formeln der multiplen Regresion aus drei BodenIdaten, namlich dem pH-Wert, dem aktiven Mangan und dem T-Wert der zu erwartende MangangehaPt der Testpflanzen leicht errechnet werden kann und daB man dann auf Grund der errechneten Pflanzengehalte den Mangan-Versorgungsgrad a n Hand eines Grenzwertsch'emas ermitteln kann.…”
Section: I S K U S S I O Nunclassified