2022
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace9120744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on the Potentials of Novel Technologies for Aircraft Fuel Burn Reduction through Aerostructural Optimisation

Abstract: A physics-based optimisation framework is developed to investigate the potential advantages of novel technologies on the energy efficiency of a midrange passenger aircraft. In particular, the coupled-adjoint aerostructural analysis and optimisation tool FEMWET is modified to study the effects of active flow control at different load cases for conventional and unconventional wing configurations. This multidisciplinary design optimisation (MDO) framework presents the opportunity to optimise the wing considering … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall aircraft optimization using DLR F-15 airfoil and assuming a laminar flow length of 60 % on the wing estimates a fuel weight reduction of 9.8 % for the backward swept mid-range aircraft [49]. Compared to this value and accounting for the actual suction power and the system weight, it can be expected that the maximum fuel weight reduction possible for the mid-range aircraft corresponds to 6.9 % for Case I and 8.6 % for Case II.…”
Section: Penalty Due To Actual Suction Velocity Distribution and Sfcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall aircraft optimization using DLR F-15 airfoil and assuming a laminar flow length of 60 % on the wing estimates a fuel weight reduction of 9.8 % for the backward swept mid-range aircraft [49]. Compared to this value and accounting for the actual suction power and the system weight, it can be expected that the maximum fuel weight reduction possible for the mid-range aircraft corresponds to 6.9 % for Case I and 8.6 % for Case II.…”
Section: Penalty Due To Actual Suction Velocity Distribution and Sfcmentioning
confidence: 99%