1972
DOI: 10.1163/187529272x00386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations On the Resistance of Rose Root-Stocks To Meloidogyne Hapla and Pratylenchus Penetrans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study R. corymbifera ˈLaxaˈ was a host for M. hapla. This is confirmed by [6] who tested 13 rose rootstocks in the field and all rootstocks turned out to be hosts for M. hapla, except for Rosa canina cv Success and R. canina cv Heinsohn's Rekord, being poor hosts.…”
Section: Fig 1 Linear Relationship Between Root Gall Number and Time ...mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study R. corymbifera ˈLaxaˈ was a host for M. hapla. This is confirmed by [6] who tested 13 rose rootstocks in the field and all rootstocks turned out to be hosts for M. hapla, except for Rosa canina cv Success and R. canina cv Heinsohn's Rekord, being poor hosts.…”
Section: Fig 1 Linear Relationship Between Root Gall Number and Time ...mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Recently, Meloidogyne hapla was found to be the most frequent and abundant species in rose greenhouses in Ethiopia [5]. For temperate regions, the damage potential of M. hapla on cut flowers is well documented throughout the world [6][7][8][9][10]. However, little is known about the damage potential of M. hapla on cut flowers other than roses as well as of the tropical root-knot nematode species on cut flowers grown in Ethiopia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model depicts that all rootstock species suffered from M. hapla damage even at the lowest initial densities, and plant weight declined up to nematode densities approximately 1 J2/g soil after which it became stable. Damage to rose rootstocks due to M. hapla infestation was also revealed by Coolen and Hendrickx (1972). The shoot-root ratio was not affected by increasing nematode densities, indicating that the reduction in root and shoot biomass by M. hapla followed a similar trend.…”
Section: Plant Weightmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The use of alternative control measures such as resistant or tolerant cultivars is of paramount importance (Wang et al 2004). Coolen and Hendrickx (1972) have shown the presence of partial resistance in cultivars of Rosa canina and R. multiflora to M. hapla. However, those evaluations were carried out with just one nematode density and the rose species might have reacted differently at different nematode densities, as crop damage becomes evident when nematode densities at planting are above the tolerance limit (Viaene and Abawi 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%