1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)00162-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigative burying by laboratory mice may involve non-functional, compulsive, behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
67
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2B) is consistent with findings published previously (Thomas et al, 2009). This observation and the fact that all deer mice exhibited burying behavior (Table 2) support the hypothesis that novel, but harmless and nonreactive, objects are devoid of anxiogenic properties, and that the MB test more appropriately resembles investigative, rather than anxious, behavior (Londei et al, 1998). That MB behavior varies between species (Nicolas et al, 2006), with IBB being displayed in both behavioral cohorts of deer mice (N and H), suggests that MB behavior is a normal, not a pathological, activity within the species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2B) is consistent with findings published previously (Thomas et al, 2009). This observation and the fact that all deer mice exhibited burying behavior (Table 2) support the hypothesis that novel, but harmless and nonreactive, objects are devoid of anxiogenic properties, and that the MB test more appropriately resembles investigative, rather than anxious, behavior (Londei et al, 1998). That MB behavior varies between species (Nicolas et al, 2006), with IBB being displayed in both behavioral cohorts of deer mice (N and H), suggests that MB behavior is a normal, not a pathological, activity within the species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, we identified a different withinspecies burying phenotype (HBB), displayed by a small minority of deer mice, that will require further investigation. Burying behavior is a natural phenomenon inherent to most rodent species, and requires experimental and methodological manipulation, such as pretest restraint (Kedia & Chattarji, 2014) or correlations with other behavioral tests (Londei et al, 1998;Torres-Lista et al, 2015), to be a useful screening tool for either anxiety or compulsivity. Using a known OCD translational model has identified the inherent shortcomings of the MB test for obsessive-compulsive behavior, although this finding should be confirmed in other translational models (e.g., Joel & Avisar, 2001;Szechtman et al, 2001), as well as in the promising range of genetic models currently available (Berridge, Aldridge, Houchard, & Zhuang, 2005;Chou-Green, Holscher, Dallman, & Akana, 2003;Shanahan et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kemble and Bolwahnn, 1997), and may even prompt avoidance and/or defensive burying (e.g. Misslin and Ropartz, 1981;Londei et al, 1998). However, mice in general seem to investigate novel objects vigorously, and accept them rapidly (Potter, 1994;Randall, 1999).…”
Section: Behaviour Within the Territory: Stable Routines In A Varyingmentioning
confidence: 99%