2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2012.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investment analysis of an integrated industrial park with carbon capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The works in [29,[34][35][36] deal with water exchange and pollution. Pollution and emission reduction are also key topics in [34,[37][38][39][40]. Conversely, refs.…”
Section: Clusters Analysis With or Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works in [29,[34][35][36] deal with water exchange and pollution. Pollution and emission reduction are also key topics in [34,[37][38][39][40]. Conversely, refs.…”
Section: Clusters Analysis With or Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, with respect to the recent emphasis on carbon emissions, Nørstebø et al [172] presented a model of carbon capture in an industrial park with a variety of taxation and user scenarios. This was followed up with a park integration study, which considered expansion by including six different types of industries, including a carbon capture plant, from an investment point of view, that included various taxation scenarios [173].…”
Section: Changing Defined Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that the technology for CO 2 injection was readily available and candidate formations could be selected based on the criteria: injectivity, storage capacity, and reservoir containment; recommending for containment concerns that a minimum reservoir depth of 800 m would protect potable water aquifers, and a maximum depth of some 3300 m would ensure that compression costs related to injection are realistic. Midthun et al (2012) described deterministic investment decision models for potential industrial sites with multiple manufacturing and power-generation plants including carbon capture. The optimization model developed focuses on design and operation of different types of plant, and is based on the analysis of an investment case in Norway.…”
Section: Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Above-ground Viability And Cmentioning
confidence: 99%