Investment cost estimates and investment decisions

Abstract

When evaluating new investment projects, oil companies traditionally use the discounted cashflow method. This method requires expected cashflows in the numerator and a risk-adjusted required rate of return in the denominator in order to calculate net present value. The capital expenditure (CAPEX) of a project is one of the major cashflows used to calculate net present value. Usually the CAPEX is given by a single cost figure, with some indication of its probability distribution. In the oil industry and many other industries, it is a common practice to report a CAPEX that is the estimated 50/50 (median) CAPEX instead of the estimated expected (expected value) CAPEX. In this article, we demonstrate how the practice of using a 50/50 (median) CAPEX, when the cost distributions are asymmetric, causes project valuation errors and therefore may lead to wrong investment decisions with acceptance of projects that have negative net present values. r

Risk Assessment of Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects—Assumptions and Context

“…An interesting comparison was published by Emhjellen [17], who dealt with the difference of values when setting different limits of normal distribution and their effect on the resulting values. Kumar [18] noted that the concessionaire aims to bear minimal cost, so maximum probability occurs at lower cost values, and hence it followed a lognormal probability distribution.…”

A critical analysis of thermochemical cellulosic biorefinery capital cost estimates

“…A lack of cellulosic biofuel commercialization to date prevents the development of fitted distributions based on TCI estimates of cellulosic biorefineries relative to actual construction costs. However, a large body of literature finds that TCI uncertainty distributions are asymmetric with a positive skew and/or bias for other type of energy projects, including hydropower, thermal power, coal mines, LEED buildings, offshore petroleum wells, offshore wind power, natural gas pipelines, as well as for general construction projects . The positive skew is due to cost overruns being more frequent and of a larger amount than cost underruns, with extreme overruns causing an overall positive bias despite the most likely overrun values being closer to zero.…”

Indicators Used in the Energy Sector

“…[4] Net present value [5] Internal rate of return [6] Return on investment [6] Payback period [7] Benefit cost ratio Concerning the levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) it is an indicator that is frequently used for renewable energy projects. The levelised cost of electricity is the average cost over the lifetime of the plant per MWh of electricity generated [9].…”