2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investment motives, ownership advantages and institutional distance: An examination of Russian cross-border acquisitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
56
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Donaldson (2001) Moreover, Russian firms are likely to suffer from liabilities of country-of-origin as well. In their recent study Dikova, Panibratov, and Veselova (2019) note that in host countries displaying politically hostile attitudes towards Russia, acquisition deals initiated by Russian firms are viewed as a threat (and often opposed) because of perceived intervention by the Russian State in Russian firms' business. These liabilities are likely to manifest as obstacles to successful internationalization.…”
Section: A Contingency Model Of Internationalization-performance Relamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Donaldson (2001) Moreover, Russian firms are likely to suffer from liabilities of country-of-origin as well. In their recent study Dikova, Panibratov, and Veselova (2019) note that in host countries displaying politically hostile attitudes towards Russia, acquisition deals initiated by Russian firms are viewed as a threat (and often opposed) because of perceived intervention by the Russian State in Russian firms' business. These liabilities are likely to manifest as obstacles to successful internationalization.…”
Section: A Contingency Model Of Internationalization-performance Relamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, foreign firms normally bring with them technological and marketing assets that they are able to transfer across borders, and that help them to overcome their LoF. These assets, known as ownership advantages (Dikova, Panibratov, and Veselova, 2019;Dunning, 1977), provide a foundation for MNEs to compete in host countries. They arise from MNE subsidiaries' access to international networks and help them to develop their resources through interaction with both MNE parents and the local context of the host country (Andersson, Forsgren, and Holm, 2001;Birkinshaw, 1996).…”
Section: Liabilities Of Foreignness and Of Localnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis shows that traditional investment motives provide a limited explanation of what attracts or deters Russian acquirers abroad. The authors include the institutional distance parameter in the model and prove that it plays a decisive role in building cross-border business interactions [2].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%