Investment obstacles to sustainable development and competitiveness index

Abstract

PurposeThis paper was aimed to develop better knowledge to show how obstacles impact Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in investment business on the global competitiveness index (GCI). This study was applied to six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) economies to analyse and classify investment obstacles in order to improve GCI and mitigate the obstacles to doing business.Design/methodology/approachThis study used the 12 pillars of the GCI to classify six GCC countries and 15 factors of SDGs using data from 2008 to 2017. The data were collected from the International Monetary Fund and GCI reports from 2008 to 2018 on all six GCC countries: the UAE, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar. The paper adopted equations to analyse the GCI, along with 15 obstacles to doing investment business. The paper used regression and correlation tests by two proxies: obstacles to SDGs as an independent variable and the GCI as a dependent variable.FindingsThe findings of this study focussed on the best classification of the GCI, which went to Qatar, whereas the lowest rank went to Oman. The major components of obstacles to doing investment business are restrictive labour regulations, access to financing and inefficient government bureaucracy factors. These obstacles stand in the way of achieving SDGs and delay the improvement of the competitive field. Hence, the results of the regression test show that there is a negative and statistically significant impact in Oman, Kuwait and the UAE between obstacles to doing business on the GCI at the significance levels of 1% and 5%. The Pearson correlation matrix is strong between obstacles to SDGs, as the same elements of the GCI also exist in these countries, at 55.2%, 75% and 55.5%, respectively.Research limitations/implicationsThere are some limitations related to the study period being from 2008 to 2017. Before 2008, the GCI consisted of nine pillars rather than 12, and there were 14 problems rather than 15 related to doing investment business. Hence, this does not match with the period of this study. Furthermore, the reports after 2017 did not mention the problems of doing business, only analysing the GCI.Practical implicationsThe results of the study highlight the strategic and practical aspects of GCC countries diagnosing the SDGs to know how to reduce obstacles to sustainable development, which can enhance investments by improving the GCI.Originality/valueThe current study measured and evaluated how to mitigate the obstacles to SDGs in the GCC countries. It is the first study to explain these obstacles in the GCC countries, which are characterised by their huge wealth that contributes significantly to global economic development.

Interactions among sustainable development goal 15 (life on land) and other sustainable development goals: Knowledge for identifying global conservation actions

“…The SDGs are wide ranging (United Nations, 2015), and achieving them before 2030 requires extraordinarily high costs due to several reasons. For example, inefficient government bureaucracy (Alshubiri, 2020), corruption and lack of transparency (Popescu et al, 2018), geopolitics (e.g., the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022) (International Energy Agency et al, 2022), interests of the political elites (Roy & Gow, 2018), and black swan events (e.g., the COVIDÀ19 pandemic) (Ranjbari et al, 2021). Most countries have been adopting arbitrary or politically convenient methods to setting priority actions (e.g., prioritizing SDGs that are easy to achieve and neglecting targets that are equally important and require indepth transformation) (Allen et al, 2019).…”

How are consumer behavior and marketing strategy researchers incorporating the SDGs? A review and opportunities for future research

“…Our review reveals that while most articles have considered different pathways of achieving the SDGs, very few have looked at the challenges of this transition (Alshubiri, 2020). Given the interconnectedness of SDGs, there is also a need to have a systems thinking approach to drive change, which requires "a systems view of organizations as embedded in society and the natural environment," including an examination of public policy ( Van der Byl & Slawinski, 2015, p. 72).…”

Managing the Risks of Innovative Activities Focused on the Consumer Market: Competitiveness vs. Corporate Responsibility

“…Competitiveness in its connection to sustainable development is studied in the works of (Afum et al 2020;Alshubiri 2020;Karman and Savanevičienė 2020;Nadalipour et al 2019). We see that it is considered from the positions of the economy as a whole and public administration, but separately from entrepreneurship and corporate management.…”