2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0922156516000595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investment Treaties, Sustainable Development and Reasonableness Review: A Case Against Strict Proportionality Balancing

Abstract: The article tackles the question of how far should investment tribunals go in reviewing the reasonableness of host state conduct. Based on an evolutionary interpretation of the preamble of international investment treaties and focusing on the principle of integration as the key element of the concept of sustainable development, the article's main argument is that investment tribunals should avoid a review based on proportionality stricto sensu or cost-benefit balancing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While 'constitutional systems … paradigmatically govern and unite all aspects of the common good within their territories and for all persons subject to their authority', 54 international investment law has a more 'monothematic nature', in that it focuses mainly 'on affording protection to foreign investments' and promoting the development of the host state. 55 IIAs often have concurring objectives, including those of promoting peaceful and prosperous relations among nations, protecting foreign investments, and promoting the (sustainable) development of the host state. Yet, they do not provide the adjudicator with a complete value system as do constitutional law instruments.…”
Section: Are Arbitral Tribunals Global Constitutional Courts?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 'constitutional systems … paradigmatically govern and unite all aspects of the common good within their territories and for all persons subject to their authority', 54 international investment law has a more 'monothematic nature', in that it focuses mainly 'on affording protection to foreign investments' and promoting the development of the host state. 55 IIAs often have concurring objectives, including those of promoting peaceful and prosperous relations among nations, protecting foreign investments, and promoting the (sustainable) development of the host state. Yet, they do not provide the adjudicator with a complete value system as do constitutional law instruments.…”
Section: Are Arbitral Tribunals Global Constitutional Courts?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En muchas de estas disputas, se discute sobre la necesidad de reducir "…la protección legal otorgada a los intereses económicos privados extranjeros, por un lado, y al poder regulador soberano de los Estados anfitriones para perseguir el interés y el bienestar público, en el otro", al decir de Tanzi 48 . En igual sentido, Ortino describe que los tribunales arbitrales están dedicados a revisar una amplia gama de actos públicos, incluidos actos de cualquier órgano estatal que ejerza funciones legislativas, ejecutivas, judiciales o de cualquier otro tipo 49 , varios de estos actos estatales se alojan en las políticas climáticas que están emprendiendo los Estados actualmente. desarrollo (I+D) en tecnologías bajas en carbono y energías renovables; 3) Facilitar el Desarrollo Sustentable y el uso de tecnologías amigables con el clima en los países en desarrollo.…”
Section: Potenciales Conflictos Entre Inversiones Y Cambio Climáticounclassified
“…Sustainable development certainly does not provide a formula to how integration and balancing shall occur 143 ; in fact, decision-makers should take advantage that the concept has an open--ended character and, thus, is adaptable to multiple situations, to use it to clarify, interpret, modify and distinguish applicable norms according to each particular situation 144 . It leaves adjudicators with greater freedom to determine the appropriate balance between the case's aspects 145 , what, ultimately, may lead to more just and complete decisions.…”
Section: A Common Feature or At Least An Island Of Consensus: Sustmentioning
confidence: 99%