2017
DOI: 10.1111/fire.12136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investor Conferences, Firm Visibility, and Stock Liquidity

Abstract: We examine the influence of investor conferences on firms’ stock liquidity. We find that firms participating in conferences experience a 1.4% to 2.8% increase in stock liquidity compared to nonconference firms. Consistent with investor conferences improving firm visibility, the increase in liquidity is larger for firms with low pre‐conference visibility and varies predictably with conference characteristics that affect the ability of investors to revise their beliefs about the firm. However, for firms with a l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have used a variety of proxies for organizational visibility such as institutional ownership, analyst coverage, and media coverage. The current study, consistent with the definition of organizational visibility, measures it using two variables: analyst coverage (NOA) and institutional ownership (INST) (e.g., Arbel et al, ; Baker et al, ; Brockman et al, ; Merton, ).…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies have used a variety of proxies for organizational visibility such as institutional ownership, analyst coverage, and media coverage. The current study, consistent with the definition of organizational visibility, measures it using two variables: analyst coverage (NOA) and institutional ownership (INST) (e.g., Arbel et al, ; Baker et al, ; Brockman et al, ; Merton, ).…”
Section: Research Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…institutional ownership (INST) (e.g., Arbel et al, 1983;Baker et al, 1999;Brockman et al, 2017;Merton, 1987).…”
Section: Organizational Visibility (Noa and Inst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prior literature documents that less visible firms can achieve certain benefits such as improved stock liquidity, reduced cost of capital, and increased stock intermediation by providing voluntary disclosure. Moreover, the prior literature finds that the effect of voluntary disclosure on those benefits is more significant for less visible firms (Bushan, 1989;Lang and Lundholm, 1996;Botosan, 1997;Brockman et al, 2017). This pronounced effect of voluntary disclosure also creates motivations for disclosure management by less visible firms (Davis and Tama-Sweet, 2012;Blankespoor et al, 2013;Hamrouni et al, 2015;Bhagwat and Burch, 2016).…”
Section: Firm Visibility and Voluntary Disclosures 221 Firm Visibilmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, since disclosure effects are more pronounced for smaller and less-visible firms (Bushan, 1989;Lang and Lundholm, 1996;Botosan, 1997;Brockman et al, 2017), individual investors should be aware of opportunistic disclosure strategies in EPRs.…”
Section: Research Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation