1998
DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investor Psychology and Security Market Under‐ and Overreactions

Abstract: We propose a theory of securities market under-and overreactions based on two well-known psychological biases: investor overconfidence about the precision of private information; and biased self-attribution, which causes asymmetric shifts in investors' confidence as a function of their investment outcomes. We show that overconfidence implies negative long-lag autocorrelations, excess volatility, and, when managerial actions are correlated with stock mispricing, public-event-based return predictability. Biased … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

203
2,569
12
56

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,698 publications
(2,840 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
203
2,569
12
56
Order By: Relevance
“…In an efficient markets explanation, revealing the expected returns pattern should make no difference for the future path of expected returns; in a quasi-rational view such as the overreaction hypothesis represents, an explicit choice-theoretic basis is needed to predict public reaction to the uncovered profit opportunities. The work by Barberis, Shleifer, and Vishny (1998), Daniel, Hirshleifer, and Subrahmanyam (1998), and Hong and Stein (1999 has already made important strides in that direction. J=3,6,9,12; K=3,6,9,12) are the combinations of J and K originally examined by Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) for U.S. stock data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an efficient markets explanation, revealing the expected returns pattern should make no difference for the future path of expected returns; in a quasi-rational view such as the overreaction hypothesis represents, an explicit choice-theoretic basis is needed to predict public reaction to the uncovered profit opportunities. The work by Barberis, Shleifer, and Vishny (1998), Daniel, Hirshleifer, and Subrahmanyam (1998), and Hong and Stein (1999 has already made important strides in that direction. J=3,6,9,12; K=3,6,9,12) are the combinations of J and K originally examined by Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) for U.S. stock data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daniel et al (1998) explain asset price bubbles with the combination of overconfidence and biased self-attribution. The essence of overconfidence in the model is that investors regard their private information concerning the fundamental value of the asset to be more accurate than it actually is; biased self-attribution means that investors attribute past successes to themselves and failures to outside factors.…”
Section: Momentum Tradersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, Daniel, et al (1998) argue that the market will experience short-term underreaction and long term overreaction if some investors are overconfident.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%