2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2696395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investor Response to Online Value Line Rank Changes: Foreign versus Local Stocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the standpoint of international investors (Chamberlain et al, 1995), argue that Value Line's recommendations published in newsletters have little value to non-US listed foreign stocks, probably due to unfamiliar political risks and legal environments, currency movements, different accounting principles and auditing practice, institutional and cultural differences, and restricted information. (Zhang et al, 2015a) further argue that the Value Line enigma is confined to US stocks. They find no evidence of a Value Line enigma for recommendations made for foreign stocks that are listed or nonlisted on US exchanges.…”
Section: International Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the standpoint of international investors (Chamberlain et al, 1995), argue that Value Line's recommendations published in newsletters have little value to non-US listed foreign stocks, probably due to unfamiliar political risks and legal environments, currency movements, different accounting principles and auditing practice, institutional and cultural differences, and restricted information. (Zhang et al, 2015a) further argue that the Value Line enigma is confined to US stocks. They find no evidence of a Value Line enigma for recommendations made for foreign stocks that are listed or nonlisted on US exchanges.…”
Section: International Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers contend that the early studies supporting the enigma are flawed (Hausman, 1969;Gregory, 1983), and that higher returns associated with the higher timeliness rankings are simply a compensation for assuming higher risk (Kaplan and Weil, 1973;Lee and Park, 1987). Others argue that the anomaly disappears after accounting for transaction costs (Hall and Tsay, 1988) or is confined to US stocks (Zhang et al, 2015a). Even others suggest that the Value Line anomaly is simply a manifestation of earnings surprises (Affleck-Graves and Mendenhall, 1992) or price momentum (Nayar et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%