Invisible Hands and Fine Calipers: A Call to Use Formal Theory as a Toolkit for Theory Construction

Abstract

In recent years, a growing chorus of researchers has argued that psychological theory is in a state of crisis: Theories are rarely developed in a way that indicates an accumulation of knowledge. Paul Meehl raised this very concern more than 40 years ago. Yet in the ensuing decades, little has improved. We aim to chart a better path forward for psychological theory by revisiting Meehl’s criticisms, his proposed solution, and the reasons his solution failed to meaningfully change the status of psychological theory. We argue that Meehl identified serious shortcomings in our evaluation of psychological theories and that his proposed solution would substantially strengthen theory testing. However, we also argue that Meehl failed to provide researchers with the tools necessary to construct the kinds of rigorous theories his approach required. To advance psychological theory, we must equip researchers with tools that allow them to better generate, evaluate, and develop their theories. We argue that formal theories provide this much-needed set of tools, equipping researchers with tools for thinking, evaluating explanation, enhancing measurement, informing theory development, and promoting the collaborative construction of psychological theories.

Mental Health and Social Contact During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

“…Fried, 2021;Fried & Cramer, 2017). Do we measure x and y at the right time frame to capture causal relations at all, and does the specified functional form (here, a linear relation) match the data-generating process (Robinaugh et al, 2021)? Do we capture the constructs with reliable and valid measures and without bias?…”

Recovering Within-Person Dynamics from Psychological Time Series

“…For a detailed account of the above proposed approach to constructing formal theories of withinperson dynamics see Haslbeck et al (in press). Our approach is only one of several recently proposed approaches that have identified the use of formal theories and computational models as critical to developing theoretical understanding of psychological phenomena (e.g., Borsboom et al, 2021;Burger et al, 2020;Guest & Martin, 2020;Robinaugh et al, 2021;van Rooij & Baggio, 2020).…”

Using Anchor-Based Methods to Determine the Smallest Effect Size of Interest

“…to determine what we would expect to see in an empirical study and to then compare these expectations with actual empirical observations (Franco et al, 2021;Robinaugh et al, 2021).…”