2021
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2021.1897874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

inVisible Theory in Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Practicum Tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theory informing the study comes from three main areas in the research literature: the role(s) of MTEs; theory-practice transitions in mathematics teacher education; and practice-theory transitions in mathematics teacher education. We acknowledge that the use of theory and practice to describe transitions between university teacher education courses and school-based field placements creates a false binary and hierarchy (Zeichner, 2010;Österling, 2022). Perpetuating the idea of a theory-practice 'gap' has been shown to be a non-productive discourse in preparing teachers, when instead the goal should be, for example, for PTs to reinvent theories in the form of 'theory-enriched practical knowledge' (Oonk et al, 2015, p. 561).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theory informing the study comes from three main areas in the research literature: the role(s) of MTEs; theory-practice transitions in mathematics teacher education; and practice-theory transitions in mathematics teacher education. We acknowledge that the use of theory and practice to describe transitions between university teacher education courses and school-based field placements creates a false binary and hierarchy (Zeichner, 2010;Österling, 2022). Perpetuating the idea of a theory-practice 'gap' has been shown to be a non-productive discourse in preparing teachers, when instead the goal should be, for example, for PTs to reinvent theories in the form of 'theory-enriched practical knowledge' (Oonk et al, 2015, p. 561).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%