2010
DOI: 10.18352/tseg.374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invisisbility and selectivity. Introduction to the special issue on Dutch overseas migration in the nineteenth and twentieth century

Abstract: Introduction to the special issue on Dutch overseas emigration in the nineteenth and twentieth century Abstract-Invisibility and selectivity. Introduction to the special issue on Dutch overseas emigration in the nineteenth and twentieth century The contributors to this special issue describe the emigration of people from the Netherlands to the most important overseas destinations (the usa, Canada and Australia) in the nineteenth and the twentieth century. Part of the Dutch (overseas) emigrants formed strongly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end of the nineteenth century, national (frequently church-based) NGOs actively encouraged emigration from Europe. 45 In 1906, the International Congress on Unemployment was held. Labour bureaus, international trade unions and NGOs drafted a proposal for international labour exchanges, in the hope of increasing labour emigration, but no country signed it.…”
Section: The First Rights Revolution:1860s-mid 1920smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the nineteenth century, national (frequently church-based) NGOs actively encouraged emigration from Europe. 45 In 1906, the International Congress on Unemployment was held. Labour bureaus, international trade unions and NGOs drafted a proposal for international labour exchanges, in the hope of increasing labour emigration, but no country signed it.…”
Section: The First Rights Revolution:1860s-mid 1920smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the NAMA case, Australian co-subsidizing of the passage required migrants to work in Australian government service for 2 years. The schema also included migrant selection with both Australian and Dutch involvement (Schrover and van Faassen, 2010). On the other side, it also implied that the Dutch authorities wanted to make migration a success.…”
Section: Connecting Policy To the Registration Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…76 In the post-war years, 115,000 people were repatriated to the Netherlands from the Dutch East Indies or Indonesia. 77 Dutch authorities feared hundreds of thousands more would come. They hoped that some of the repatriates would be able to go to the US as refugees.…”
Section: The Dutch Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%