2019
DOI: 10.1111/codi.14917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invitation for colorectal cancer screening or forced marketing?

Abstract: I read with interest the systematic review of the outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer, by Waters et al. [1] This systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I am afraid that this looks like the foot-in-the-door technique (referring to a door-to-door salesperson who keeps the door from shutting with their foot so customers have no choice but to listen), a compliance tactic that aims to get a person to agree to a large request by having them agree to a modest request first. This is a widespread issue; another example is the mailing of fecal test kits for colorectal cancer screening . However, it could be worse, considering that in Uruguay in 2006, it became mandatory for all women aged 40 to 59 years to have a mammogram every 2 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am afraid that this looks like the foot-in-the-door technique (referring to a door-to-door salesperson who keeps the door from shutting with their foot so customers have no choice but to listen), a compliance tactic that aims to get a person to agree to a large request by having them agree to a modest request first. This is a widespread issue; another example is the mailing of fecal test kits for colorectal cancer screening . However, it could be worse, considering that in Uruguay in 2006, it became mandatory for all women aged 40 to 59 years to have a mammogram every 2 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%