2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02696-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invited Discussion on: Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes of 19 Patients Undergoing Clitoral and Labial Reconstruction After Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, one must take into account that it is not clear whether the success of the psychotherapeutic counselling depends on the women's psychological co-morbidities, the extent of the mutilation, or other factors-just as it is unknown in which way these factors influence the success of surgical approaches [10,11]. Various publications have demonstrated a benefit of surgical clitoral reconstruction [12][13][14][15][16]. However, systematic reviews of studies evaluating safety and clinical outcomes illustrate that these studies provide a very low level of evidence, limited by incomplete follow-up, small sample size, non-validated scales, and various confounding factors [4,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, one must take into account that it is not clear whether the success of the psychotherapeutic counselling depends on the women's psychological co-morbidities, the extent of the mutilation, or other factors-just as it is unknown in which way these factors influence the success of surgical approaches [10,11]. Various publications have demonstrated a benefit of surgical clitoral reconstruction [12][13][14][15][16]. However, systematic reviews of studies evaluating safety and clinical outcomes illustrate that these studies provide a very low level of evidence, limited by incomplete follow-up, small sample size, non-validated scales, and various confounding factors [4,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, extending the indication for surgery beyond deinfibulation and offering procedures such as the re-exposition of the clitoris or the formation of a neo-prepuce has increasingly raised concerns and controversy [4,16,25]. Nevertheless, various genital reconstructive techniques have proven their value in defect reconstruction after tumor surgery or after infectious processes [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%