2019
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invited Faculty Abstracts from the International Neuromodulation Society’s 14th World Congress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size was calculated based on a previous pilot test carried out on seven healthy volunteers [ 21 ]. For an expected between-group mean difference (MD) in the PPT of 10.3 N/cm 2 with a standard deviation (SD) of 11.3 N/cm 2 in the experimental group and SD 9.9 N/cm 2 in the control group and considering a type I error (α) of 0.05 and a power of 80%, the sample size was estimated to be 17 subjects per group ( n = 17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample size was calculated based on a previous pilot test carried out on seven healthy volunteers [ 21 ]. For an expected between-group mean difference (MD) in the PPT of 10.3 N/cm 2 with a standard deviation (SD) of 11.3 N/cm 2 in the experimental group and SD 9.9 N/cm 2 in the control group and considering a type I error (α) of 0.05 and a power of 80%, the sample size was estimated to be 17 subjects per group ( n = 17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, percutaneous stimulation can avoid the inconveniences associated with the surgical implantation of electrodes, such as scars or additional procedures to replace them [ 19 ]. This intervention has been shown to be safe and with minimum risks in low- [ 20 ] and high-frequency [ 21 ] electrical stimulations. The main aim of this trial is to assess the effect of percutaneous electric stimulation with 10 kHz and 20 kHz HFAC applied to the median nerve compared to the sham stimulation on the motor response, somatosensory thresholds, and peripheral nerve conduction in healthy volunteers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research investigating the impact of 10 kHz SCS on medication consumption is promising (19,20). Opioid consumption appears to decrease with 10 kHz SCS (5,13,15,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Additionally, greater decreases in opioid use compared to conventional SCS (14,16) and conventional medical management (27) have been observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both procedures have shown positive results, they entail risks derived from additional interventions to replace electrodes ( Finch et al, 2019 ). The ultrasound-guided percutaneous application of currents can be considered a minimally invasive procedure ( Boyce et al, 2020 ) that allows reducing the distance between the electrode and nerve ( Williamson and Andrews, 2005 ) and has proven to be a safe method with minimum associated risks ( Eldabe et al, 2016 ; No author list, 2019 ). Our research group observed in a pilot study that the percutaneous ultrasound-guided application of 20 kHz HFAC to the median nerve was a feasible, safe procedure with minimal risks and with a potential effect on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) ( No author list, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultrasound-guided percutaneous application of currents can be considered a minimally invasive procedure ( Boyce et al, 2020 ) that allows reducing the distance between the electrode and nerve ( Williamson and Andrews, 2005 ) and has proven to be a safe method with minimum associated risks ( Eldabe et al, 2016 ; No author list, 2019 ). Our research group observed in a pilot study that the percutaneous ultrasound-guided application of 20 kHz HFAC to the median nerve was a feasible, safe procedure with minimal risks and with a potential effect on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) ( No author list, 2019 ). The outcomes of another recent study that applied ultrasound-guided HFAC at 10 and 20 kHz via needle electrodes showed that this safe procedure produced a decrease in the maximum handgrip strength using 20 kHz, but not 10 kHz, without any changes being observed in any somatosensory threshold ( Álvarez et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%