2020
DOI: 10.1177/0309132520961881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inviting the stranger in: Intimacy, digital technology and new geographies of encounter

Abstract: Digital technologies are profoundly reshaping how people relate to unknown others, yet urban studies and geographies of encounter have yet to adequately incorporate these changes into theory and research. Building on a longstanding concern with stranger encounters in social and urban theory, this paper explores how digital technology brings new possibilities and challenges to urban life. With examples ranging from GPS-enabled apps for sex and dating to sharing economy platforms that facilitate the peer-to-peer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(181 reference statements)
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, it offers an overlaying of physical environments with virtual connectivity and virtual and/or hybrid environments. The relationship between virtual and material worlds has become so intertwined as to now rarely be conceptualized as separate in any meaningful sense (see Barns et al 2017;Kitchin and Dodge 2011;Farman 2012;Miles 2017). As Robyn Longhurst (2013: 667) argues: 'people conduct their personal, familial, and emotional lives in a myriad of ways in a variety of different spaces.…”
Section: Situating Sexualities Cities and Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, it offers an overlaying of physical environments with virtual connectivity and virtual and/or hybrid environments. The relationship between virtual and material worlds has become so intertwined as to now rarely be conceptualized as separate in any meaningful sense (see Barns et al 2017;Kitchin and Dodge 2011;Farman 2012;Miles 2017). As Robyn Longhurst (2013: 667) argues: 'people conduct their personal, familial, and emotional lives in a myriad of ways in a variety of different spaces.…”
Section: Situating Sexualities Cities and Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact brokered online may stay online (Miles 2019), and there is no reason why these virtual connections cannot be richly fulfilling in and of themselvesemotionally, sexually, platonically, or politically. However, where cybersexual practices are converted to in-person meetings, whether pre-arranged or spontaneously, app users are increasingly meeting in private spaces, usually the home (Giraud 2016;Koch and Miles 2020). In the process, they sidestep certain risks generated by samesex public meeting: anything from being harassed by passersby on a date to being bothered by police or security staff when cruising in public.…”
Section: The Ambiguous Impact Of Location-based Media On Existing Gaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital spaces are inextricably woven into our everyday practices of consumption and communication, work, play and politics (Ash et al. 2019; Gerbaudo 2012; Koch and Miles 2020; Nyabola 2018). This paper examines how WhatsApp, with its digital private spaces, has become central to everyday “political talk” in India and what the implications are for lived democracy.…”
Section: Introduction: Digital Private Spaces and “Political Talk”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I adopt a feminist corporeal theoretical framework that aligns with assemblage thinking to explore how Grindr encounters are assembled through bodies, senses, phones, pictures, objects, and homes, and the anticipations, desires, and emotions that assemble them, that allow for the emergence of sexual subjectivities and practices. Doing so, I understand the digital as a corporeal and embodied 2017, 2018, 2020. I draw on a particular area of corporeal scholarship – haptic geographies – that is sensitive to the ways touching and place are co‐constituted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%