2003
DOI: 10.1081/imm-120022973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of Cyclooxygenase‐1 and ‐2 in the Sciatic Nerve of Rats with Experimental Autoimmune Neuritis

Abstract: The expression of both cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2, which are representative enzymes in prostaglandin synthesis, was evaluated in the sciatic nerve of rats with experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN). Western blot analysis showed that both COX-1 and COX-2 were significantly increased in the sciatic nerve at the peak stage of EAN and declined during the recovery stage. Vascular endothelial cells in normal sciatic nerves immunostained for both COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 was mainly detected in macrophages, and n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such negative findings suggest that COX-1 expression in trigeminal primary afferent nociceptive neurons, if present, may be limited to the cell body and not transported to the nociceptor’s peripheral endings in the dura. Our findings are supported by other studies which also failed to detect COX-1 expression in peripheral nerves [10, 12, 19], but are in contrast to a recent study showing COX-1 immunoreactivity in large cutaneous nerve branches, as well as small intradermal nerve bundles and nerve endings [13]. Such discrepancies may be due to differences between the innervation of the skin and the dura or more generally between trigeminal and non-trigeminal sensory innervations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Such negative findings suggest that COX-1 expression in trigeminal primary afferent nociceptive neurons, if present, may be limited to the cell body and not transported to the nociceptor’s peripheral endings in the dura. Our findings are supported by other studies which also failed to detect COX-1 expression in peripheral nerves [10, 12, 19], but are in contrast to a recent study showing COX-1 immunoreactivity in large cutaneous nerve branches, as well as small intradermal nerve bundles and nerve endings [13]. Such discrepancies may be due to differences between the innervation of the skin and the dura or more generally between trigeminal and non-trigeminal sensory innervations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Active EAN was induced in the rats as described earlier ( Shin et al, 2002; 2003 ; Ahn et al, 2004a; 2004b ; Moon et al, 2005 ) . Briefly, each rat was injected in both hind footpads with an emulsion containing 100 µg SP26, a neuritogenic peptide homologous to amino acids 53–78 of bovine myelin P2 protein (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA; Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra, 5 mg/ml).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the fact that local COX-2-mediated PG production is dramatically increased after nerve injury, and that PGs are capable of modulating the expression of pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines, suggests that there might be an important role for COX-2 and PGs in the evolution of nerve degeneration and regeneration [116] . Both COX-1 and COX-2 expression is increased in macrophages and SCs in animal models of inflammatory demyelinating diseases [117] . A role for COX-1 expression in microglia and macrophages in tissue remodeling dur-ing WD in the spinal cord has also been proposed [118] .…”
Section: Aa and Its Metabolitesmentioning
confidence: 99%