1972
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(72)90023-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of gustatory neocortex in the learning of taste aversions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
83
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
12
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was hypothesized further that GN ablation selectively disrupts associative salience thresholds for taste stimuli without necessarily disrupting detection thresholds (Braun & Rosenthal, 1976); that is, the systems underlying associability and detectability of the same stimuli could be viewed as being dissociated by the GN lesion. Braun and Rosenthal (1976) found that a procedure known to reduce the associative potential of normal rats for tastes, the imposition of a very long CS-US interval (e.g., Revusky & Garcia, 1970; J. C. Smith & Roll, 1967), produced results for normal rats that were essentially identical to those reported by Braun et al (1972) for rats lacking GN (see Table 3). It was therefore concluded that the Braun et al (1972) finding of a salience difference between .1-mM-quinine and 4.8-mM-saccharin stimuli was probably due to the unmasking, by ON ablation, of a normal salience difference between these stimuli.…”
Section: Initial Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was hypothesized further that GN ablation selectively disrupts associative salience thresholds for taste stimuli without necessarily disrupting detection thresholds (Braun & Rosenthal, 1976); that is, the systems underlying associability and detectability of the same stimuli could be viewed as being dissociated by the GN lesion. Braun and Rosenthal (1976) found that a procedure known to reduce the associative potential of normal rats for tastes, the imposition of a very long CS-US interval (e.g., Revusky & Garcia, 1970; J. C. Smith & Roll, 1967), produced results for normal rats that were essentially identical to those reported by Braun et al (1972) for rats lacking GN (see Table 3). It was therefore concluded that the Braun et al (1972) finding of a salience difference between .1-mM-quinine and 4.8-mM-saccharin stimuli was probably due to the unmasking, by ON ablation, of a normal salience difference between these stimuli.…”
Section: Initial Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We speculated that the change in the "salience" (Kalat & Rozin, 1970), or conditionability, of the saccharin cue, without concomitant changes in detectability relative to water, might be a common effect of GN lesions across taste qualities, an effect which may not have been observed for the quinine stimulus in this first study because of a floor effect (Braun et al, 1972). As a basis for follow-up studies, it was hypothesized that there were two kinds of relatively independent thresholds to consider for taste stimuli: a preference-aversion, or reactive, threshold, and a conditionability, or associative salience, threshold.…”
Section: Initial Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The insula receives input from the basolateral amygdala (Krettek and Price, 1977;Shinonaga et al, 1994) and projects to the striatum (Wright and Groenewegan, 1996) and is thus is considered an integral part of the corticomesolimbic system. The insula is hypothesized to mediate higher cognitive processes such as memory and learning related to taste (Balleine and Dickinson, 2000;Braun et al, 1972;Kiefer and Braun, 1977). Lesion studies support the hypothesis that insular cortex is crucial to encoding the incentive value of taste during instrumental conditioning (Balleine and Dickinson, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%