2018
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00944.2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of hypoglossal and recurrent laryngeal nerves on swallowing pressure

Abstract: Swallowing pressure generation is important to ensure safe transport of an ingested bolus without aspiration or leaving residue in the pharynx. To clarify the mechanism, we measured swallowing pressure at the oropharynx (OP), upper esophageal sphincter (UES), and cervical esophagus (CE) using a specially designed manometric catheter in anesthetized rats. A swallow, evoked by punctate mechanical stimulation to the larynx, was identified by recording activation of the suprahyoid and thyrohyoid muscles using elec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the SH and TH durations and the onset and offset lag times between these muscles showed high intraindividual reproducibility. Consistent with these results, we previously reported that the swallowing pressure at the oropharynx, upper oesophageal sphincter and cervical oesophagus exhibited high intraindividual reproducibility (Tsujimura et al 2018). Jafari et al (2003) suggested that the afferent signals from the internal branch of the SLN, which contains afferents from the supraglottic larynx and epiglottis, play an important role in normal swallowing, particularly in facilitating laryngeal closure during swallowing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found that the SH and TH durations and the onset and offset lag times between these muscles showed high intraindividual reproducibility. Consistent with these results, we previously reported that the swallowing pressure at the oropharynx, upper oesophageal sphincter and cervical oesophagus exhibited high intraindividual reproducibility (Tsujimura et al 2018). Jafari et al (2003) suggested that the afferent signals from the internal branch of the SLN, which contains afferents from the supraglottic larynx and epiglottis, play an important role in normal swallowing, particularly in facilitating laryngeal closure during swallowing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Consistent with these results, we previously reported that the swallowing pressure at the oropharynx, upper oesophageal sphincter and cervical oesophagus exhibited high intraindividual reproducibility (Tsujimura et al . ). Jafari et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, while murine laryngeal anatomy limits the assessment of aspiration (Lever, Braun, et al, ; Lever, Brooks, et al, ), other outcome metrics, especially those related to esophageal dysphagia, may be affected by RLN injury in this model. As the RLN also provides innervation to the esophagus in addition to the intrinsic laryngeal muscles, the trend for increased esophageal transit time following RLN transection observed in this study is consistent with pharyngoesophageal dysfunction documented in other RLN injury models (Fukushima et al, ; Gould et al, ; Tsujimura et al, ) and human unilateral VF paralysis patients (Aneas, Ricz, Mello‐Filho, & Dantas, ; Wilson, Pryde, White, Maher, & Maran, ). As such, future studies may benefit by utilizing a higher speed camera to better capture the start and end points of esophageal bolus transit or alternative methods, such as manometry, to accurately determine if significant pharyngeal or esophageal dysphagia exists in this small, fast‐drinking species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although insult to either SLN or RLN results in increased aspiration (16,17), these two lesions impact the size and shape of the bolus in infant animal models differently (13,18,19). After surgical transection of the right SLN, the volume of the bolus was greater (13), although bolus size was not associated with increased aspiration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%